Skip to main content

Is ourtx.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Russian Cultural Center - Our Texas Reviews

R

Is ourtx.org Safe? Security Analysis for Russian Cultural Center - Our Texas

https://ourtx.org

Check if ourtx.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statessmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginModern Events Calendar Lite pluginElementor page builderAuxin Elements plugin+6 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 10:42:26 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Russian Cultural Center - Our Texas is a small nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting Russian culture in Texas through language classes, cultural events, and art exhibitions. Established in 2004, it serves a niche audience interested in Russian language and culture, providing educational and cultural services primarily in Houston, Texas. The organization maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and consistent messaging, supported by social media channels and partnerships with cultural funding bodies.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginModern Events Calendar Lite pluginElementor page builderAuxin Elements pluginGiveWP donation pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryMediaElement.jsGoogle Maps API

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Russian Cultural Center - Our Texas

Description:

Russian Cultural Center is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization that brings Russian culture via Language Classes, Art, and Cultural Events.

Key Services:
Language Classes for Kids and AdultsCultural EventsArt Gallery ExhibitionsTheater and Tours
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginModern Events Calendar Lite pluginElementor page builderAuxin Elements pluginGiveWP donation pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryMediaElement.jsGoogle Maps API
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable plugins

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a nonprofit cultural center focused on Russian culture in Texas.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

18 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(44 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • •Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:192.124.249.165
Name Servers:
ns51.domaincontrol.com
ns52.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
10: mailstore1.secureserver.net
0: smtp.secureserver.net
SOA:Serial: 2023100505, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a mature WordPress ecosystem with popular plugins for SEO, events, donations, and page building. The technology stack is modern and well-supported, though some technical debt exists in missing DNSSEC and security headers. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The site is well-structured and SEO optimized, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced.
Analyze Another Website