Skip to main content

Is overnght.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Overnight Reviews

O

Is overnght.com Safe? Security Analysis for Overnight

Check if overnght.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ReactNext.jsPostHog analyticsAmazon IVS player
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:37:05 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Overnight appears to be a digital platform focused on sports-related content or services, targeting sports enthusiasts and bettors. The website offers user account functionalities such as sign-in and sign-up, indicating a service or membership model. However, the content is minimal and lacks detailed business descriptions or extensive textual information. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, with integrated analytics via PostHog and video streaming capabilities through Amazon IVS. Despite this, the website lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for user trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is accessible and safe for general audiences but requires improvements in security posture and transparency to enhance credibility.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsPostHog analyticsAmazon IVS player

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the digital sports content or betting information sector, with a small-scale online presence. Its business model likely revolves around user engagement through account creation and content navigation. The lack of explicit company details, physical addresses, or contact emails limits the ability to assess market positioning or revenue streams. The use of modern web technologies suggests a focus on user experience and performance, but the minimal content and absence of trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials constrain competitive advantage. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. Growth potential may be hindered by limited transparency and security practices.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies, incident response contacts, or certifications. The lack of cookie consent and privacy compliance indicators suggests potential GDPR compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, but the absence of security best practices reduces the overall security score. The missing WHOIS data further impacts trust and legitimacy. Enhancing security headers, implementing clear privacy and incident response policies, and ensuring compliance with data protection regulations are recommended to improve security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Overnight

Description:

Online platform related to sports content aggregation or sports betting information (inferred from navigation and branding).

Key Services:
sports navigationuser account management
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsPostHog analyticsAmazon IVS player
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
PostHog
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PostHog
Marketing Tools:
PostHog
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.overnght.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

80/100
Score

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:overnght.com
Issuer:Amazon ECDSA 256 M03
Valid Until:6/28/2026 (296 days)
SANs:overnght.com, *.overnght.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.251.168, 15.197.225.128
Name Servers:
ns15.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns16.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090101, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:408ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.overnght.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. Analytics are handled via PostHog, and video streaming is supported by Amazon IVS. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. However, the absence of detected CMS or hosting provider details limits infrastructure insights. Performance is moderate with some room for SEO and accessibility improvements. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and richer content to improve user engagement and trust.
Analyze Another Website