Skip to main content

Is oxfam.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - Oxfam Canada Reviews

O

Is oxfam.ca Safe? Security Analysis for Oxfam Canada

Check if oxfam.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitCanadalarge
WordPressjQueryBeaver BuilderGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:25:13 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Oxfam Canada is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to fighting global poverty and promoting women's rights through humanitarian response, long-term development, and advocacy. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, including detailed FAQs, structured data, and multiple engagement forms for donations and volunteering. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates various analytics and marketing tools, ensuring good performance and SEO. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, secure forms, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are not publicly visible. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the strong branding and content consistency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its mission and audience.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryBeaver BuilderGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelAdRollMicrosoft ClarityIntercom

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Oxfam Canada operates as a large non-profit entity affiliated with the global Oxfam International confederation. Its business model relies on donations, grants, and partnerships, targeting donors, volunteers, and humanitarian stakeholders. The organization maintains a strong market position in the humanitarian aid sector with a focus on women's rights and social justice. The website supports fundraising and advocacy campaigns and collaborates with partner sites such as unwrapped.oxfam.ca for merchandise sales. The digital ecosystem includes robust marketing and analytics integrations, supporting growth and outreach efforts. Transparency is emphasized through published reports and accreditation badges, enhancing donor confidence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@oxfam.ca

Phone Numbers (1)

180*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure data collection forms, and cookie consent compliance. Multiple security headers are likely implemented, and no sensitive data exposure was detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks publicly accessible security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended best practices for organizations handling donor and volunteer data. The use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts introduces a moderate tracking footprint, balanced by privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security documentation and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure process.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Oxfam Canada

Description:

Oxfam Canada is a charity organization focused on ending poverty and inequality globally, with a strong emphasis on women's rights, humanitarian response, long-term development, and advocacy.

Key Services:
Humanitarian emergency responseLong-term development projectsAdvocacy and campaigning for social justice and women's rights
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryBeaver BuilderGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelAdRollMicrosoft ClarityIntercom
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with required fields
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Microsoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
AdRollFacebook AdsBing AdsReddit AdsGoogle Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelAdRoll PixelMicrosoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
Intercom
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

37/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:50.21.160.101 include:_spf.smtp.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.e-activist.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 10 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(9 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.135.42
Name Servers:
dns.domainsatcost.ca
dns2.domainsatcost.ca
ns1.d-zone.caDNS only
ns2.d-zone.caDNS only
MX Records:
5: oxfam-ca.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:206ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:50.21.160.101 include:_spf.smtp.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.e-activist.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Beaver Builder framework and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates jQuery and multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, AdRoll, and Intercom for analytics, marketing, and user engagement. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices with comprehensive metadata and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of external scripts and tracking pixels. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for a large non-profit organization.
Analyze Another Website