Skip to main content

Is oxfam.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Oxfam Deutschland Reviews

oxfam.de favicon

Is oxfam.de Safe? Security Analysis for Oxfam Deutschland

Check if oxfam.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitGermanylarge
Drupal 10Matomo AnalyticsUsercentrics Consent ManagementFacebook PixelMicrosoft Advertising UET
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:16:27 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Oxfam Deutschland operates as a large, established non-profit organization dedicated to combating social inequality, poverty, and exploitation globally. The website reflects a strong commitment to transparency, humanitarian aid, and advocacy, targeting a broad audience interested in social justice and sustainable development. The organization leverages modern web technologies including Drupal 10, Matomo analytics, and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and privacy-conscious tracking, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, supporting Oxfam's mission effectively online.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 10Matomo AnalyticsUsercentrics Consent ManagementFacebook PixelMicrosoft Advertising UET

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Oxfam Deutschland holds a strong market position as a reputable NGO in Germany, focusing on humanitarian aid, advocacy, and sustainable development projects. Its business model relies on donations, campaigns, and partnerships. The website's content and navigation support engagement and fundraising efforts. The presence of multiple social media channels and transparent governance information enhances credibility. The organization does not publicly expose direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site, possibly to reduce spam or direct inquiries to structured channels. Hosting with OVH and use of Drupal CMS are consistent with professional NGO standards.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of consent management tools, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Tracking scripts are loaded asynchronously with user consent, respecting privacy. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident in the HTML source and should be verified server-side. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance security transparency. Overall, the site balances usability and security well, suitable for a non-profit organization.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Oxfam Deutschland

Description:

Oxfam vereint weltweit Menschen, die sich nicht mit sozialer Ungleichheit, Armut und Ausbeutung abfinden wollen.

Key Services:
Humanitarian crisis reliefAdvocacy on social inequalitySustainable development projectsFundraising and donationsEducational campaigns
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal 10Matomo AnalyticsUsercentrics Consent ManagementFacebook PixelMicrosoft Advertising UET
Frameworks:
Drupal
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of deferred and async scripts
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Microsoft Advertising
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMatomo
Marketing Tools:
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:149.233.9.50 ip4:91.216.245.166 ip4:78.46.128.86 ip4:212.168.16.99 ip4:194.231.55.192/26 ip4:194.77.111.0/24 ip4:212.168.1.0/24 ip4:192.166.195.97 ip6:2001:aa0:180:201::101 include:oxfam.spf.werk21system.de include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:178.63.143.218
Name Servers:
dns13.ovh.net
ns13.ovh.net
MX Records:
0: oxfam-de.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090300, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:152ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:149.233.9.50 ip4:91.216.245.166 ip4:78.46.128.86 ip4:212.168.16.99 ip4:194.231.55.192/26 ip4:194.77.111.0/24 ip4:212.168.1.0/24 ip4:192.166.195.97 ip6:2001:aa0:180:201::101 include:oxfam.spf.werk21system.de include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, hosted on OVH infrastructure, and uses modern JavaScript libraries for analytics and consent management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses deferred and async loading for scripts to improve load times. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML. The technical stack is appropriate for a large NGO, balancing functionality, security, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website