Skip to main content

Is oxfamibis.dk a Scam? Security Check Results - Oxfam Danmark Reviews

oxfamibis.dk favicon

Is oxfamibis.dk Safe? Security Analysis for Oxfam Danmark

Check if oxfamibis.dk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitDenmarkmedium
JavaScript ES ModulesCookiebot Consent ManagementGoogle Tag ManagerNew Relic Browser Monitoring
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:17:08 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Oxfam Danmark is a well-established non-profit organization focused on combating inequality and advocating for social justice in Denmark. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting a general audience interested in social equity and community engagement. The organization has a history dating back over 50 years, with the domain registered since 2009, aligning with its operational timeline. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript modules, integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and uses Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is supported by the cookie consent mechanism, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found in the provided content. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and suitable for its non-profit mission.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript ES ModulesCookiebot Consent ManagementGoogle Tag ManagerNew Relic Browser Monitoring

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on social justice and equality advocacy. Its business model revolves around community engagement and fundraising to support its causes. The website content and metadata emphasize its long-standing commitment to fighting inequality. The lack of direct contact information on the main page suggests that contact details may be located elsewhere or handled through other channels. The use of Cookiebot and New Relic indicates a mature approach to compliance and performance monitoring. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the content. The organization's market position is stable within the Danish non-profit landscape, leveraging digital tools to maintain engagement and transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

o*****@oxfam.dk

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and active cookie consent management. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The integration of New Relic suggests ongoing monitoring for performance and error tracking, which supports proactive security management. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is available, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, further supporting trustworthiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Oxfam Danmark

Description:

I mere end 50 år har Oxfam bekæmpet ulighed og kæmpet for retfærdighed. Tag del i fælleskabet og støt os i kampen for en retfærdig fremtid.

Key Services:
Advocacy against inequalityFundraising for social justice causesCommunity engagement
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript ES ModulesCookiebot Consent ManagementGoogle Tag ManagerNew Relic Browser Monitoring
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerNew Relic Browser Monitoring
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
New Relic Browser Monitoring
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot Consent Management
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.163.189.32 ip4:20.229.171.18 ip4:193.104.202.175 ip4:91.102.90.190 ip4:94.18.196.250 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.messagelabs.com include:mailcontrol.com include:_spf.messagegears.net include:spf.mandrillapp.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(266 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:13.51.62.86
Name Servers:
ns01.one.comDNS only
ns02.one.comDNS only
oxfam.dkWHOIS only
MX Records:
0: oxfam-dk.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025081401, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:46ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.163.189.32 ip4:20.229.171.18 ip4:193.104.202.175 ip4:91.102.90.190 ip4:94.18.196.250 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.messagelabs.com include:mailcontrol.com include:_spf.messagegears.net include:spf.mandrillapp.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern JavaScript modules and asynchronous script loading, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. Google Tag Manager and New Relic scripts are present for analytics and performance monitoring. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain, suggesting self-hosted or dedicated hosting. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance appears moderate with preloading of critical assets. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features like focus-visible are present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC.
Analyze Another Website