Skip to main content

Is ozoneproject.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Ozone Reviews

ozoneproject.com favicon

Is ozoneproject.com Safe? Security Analysis for Ozone

Check if ozoneproject.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Kingdommedium
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAjQuery+4 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:56:18 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ozone is a UK-based digital advertising business that differentiates itself by leveraging real human connections at scale combined with creative and audience capabilities to deliver measurable business impact for brands. The company targets advertisers and publishers, positioning itself as an audience connection platform with a focus on quality and effectiveness. The website is built on WordPress using the Genesis Framework and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA. The technical infrastructure is hosted on reputable platforms with Amazon Registrar as the domain registrar, indicating stable and consistent domain management. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled, domain lock statuses set, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although there is room for improvement in DNSSEC and security policy disclosures. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized digital presence suitable for its business model and audience.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAjQueryGenesis FrameworkAdvanced Backgrounds pluginGetwid blocksEasy Fancybox

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Ozone operates in the media sector, focusing on digital advertising through an audience-first approach. Its business model centers on connecting brands with engaged audiences via publishers and creative advertising formats. The company appears medium-sized with a history dating back to 2011, supported by a mature domain and consistent branding. The presence of social media channels and structured data enhances its market visibility and credibility. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. No evidence of certifications or security frameworks was found, indicating potential areas for growth in trust and compliance. The company’s strategic advantage lies in its unique positioning as a platform that combines human connections with data-driven advertising solutions.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@ozoneproject.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags preventing unauthorized transfers or deletions. The use of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via CookiePro, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and may pose risks in DNS spoofing or incident handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content. Security headers beyond domain lock statuses were not explicitly identified, suggesting room for enhancement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ozone

Description:

Ozone – a digital advertising business with a difference – combines real human connections at scale with standout creative and deep audience capabilities to deliver measurable business impact for brands.

Key Services:
digital advertisingaudience connection platformcreative formatsadvertiser and publisher services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAjQueryGenesis FrameworkAdvanced Backgrounds pluginGetwid blocksEasy Fancybox
Frameworks:
Genesis Framework
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Domain locked with clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed digital advertising platform focused on audience connection.

πŸ›‘οΈSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

πŸ‘€GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

πŸ›‘οΈNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

πŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.atlassian.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1344-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-notifications@ozoneproject.com

πŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

πŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: alt.2aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.21, 141.193.213.20
Name Servers:
ns-1137.awsdns-14.orgDNS only
ns-2040.awsdns-63.co.ukDNS only
ns-297.awsdns-37.comDNS only
ns-651.awsdns-17.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt.2aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:279ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.atlassian.net ~all

⚑Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

πŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with the Genesis Framework, leveraging modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and CookiePro for cookie consent management. It uses Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and bot protection. Hosting and DNS are managed via Amazon Registrar and AWS DNS servers, indicating a reliable infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with structured data implemented via JSON-LD. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content and multiple external resources. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, modern, and aligned with best practices for a digital advertising platform.
Analyze Another Website