Skip to main content

Is pagen.so a Scam? Security Check Results - pagen.so Reviews

pagen.so favicon

Is pagen.so Safe? Security Analysis for pagen.so

Check if pagen.so is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseGoogle Ad Services
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 12:43:35 PM
37
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website pagen.so currently functions as a parked domain primarily displaying advertising content and related search ads. There is no substantive business information, product or service descriptions, or contact details available. The site appears to be monetized through Google Adsense and Bodis advertising networks. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded Google ad scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal, and SEO features are basic. Security posture is weak with no evident security headers or privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. The domain uses privacy-protected WHOIS data, which limits transparency and reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site lacks business credibility and does not provide meaningful content or user engagement features.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseGoogle Ad Services

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain pagen.so does not present a clear business model beyond domain parking and advertising revenue generation. There is no identifiable company, no contact information, and no declared services or products. The target audience is general internet users who may click on ads or related search links. The lack of business information and privacy-protected WHOIS data suggest this is a speculative or monetized domain rather than an operational business. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The site’s market position is negligible, serving primarily as an ad platform.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The site lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced security controls. No incident response or security policies are published. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices exposes the site to potential risks. The privacy-protected WHOIS data reduces transparency and may be a concern for trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

pagen.so

Description:

The website appears to be a parked domain or placeholder page with advertising content and related search ads. No clear business description or services are provided.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseGoogle Ad Services
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseBodis
Tracking Pixels:
Google Ad Services
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain with advertising and related search content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No MX records found

MEDIUM

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No Name Servers Found

HIGH

Unable to find name servers for domain

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(338 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:199.59.243.228
Name Servers:
dns101.registrar-servers.comWHOIS only
dns102.registrar-servers.comWHOIS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:221ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

HIGH

Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

CRITICAL

Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: MongoDB

CRITICAL

Port 27017 (MongoDB) is publicly accessible - MongoDB - NoSQL database

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Advertising is integrated via Google Adsense and Bodis networks. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization. Mobile responsiveness is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is limited to basic meta tags without structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider is not clearly identified but the IP address suggests a standard hosting environment. There is no evidence of technical debt but the site’s minimal content and functionality limit its digital maturity.
Analyze Another Website