Skip to main content

Is pakistan-betting.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Sazeni-On-line Reviews

pakistan-betting.com favicon

Is pakistan-betting.com Safe? Security Analysis for Sazeni-On-line

Check if pakistan-betting.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG iconsCSS3HTML5
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:45:34 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

PakistanBetting.com is an informational and affiliate platform focused on providing Pakistani bettors with comprehensive reviews of online sportsbooks, betting markets, odds, and safe payment methods. The website is operated by the company Sazeni-On-line, based in Prague, Czech Republic, founded in 2020. It targets the Pakistani online betting community with educational content, bookmaker reviews, and bonus offers. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, SVG icons, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating basic GDPR compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG iconsCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in a niche market segment providing betting-related content and affiliate marketing services to Pakistani users. It leverages a community-driven approach with registered users and monthly readership. The company promotes responsible gambling and runs an online betting academy, which adds value and trust signals. The business model relies on content marketing, bonuses, and bookmaker reviews to attract and retain users. Partnerships with related gambling information sites across regions indicate a broader network. Growth indicators include a steady user base and active content updates. However, lack of direct contact information and domain registration transparency may impact credibility with some users.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and forms include CSRF tokens, which are positive indicators. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. Data protection practices appear minimal beyond privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration transparency is a notable risk factor. Overall, the site is functional but lacks advanced security and compliance features expected for a gambling-related platform.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sazeni-On-line

Description:

With the help of Pakistani bettors through reviews, find the top sportsbooks online. Learn about odds, betting markets, and safe ways to make payments.

Key Services:
Bookmakers reviewsBonuses informationBetting-related educational contentNewsletter subscription
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG iconsCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Newsletter subscription
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.pakistan-betting.com
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:10/13/2025 (73 days)
SANs:pakistan-betting.com, www.pakistan-betting.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(173 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:88.86.119.85
AAAA Records:2a01:28:ca:112::1:802
Name Servers:
ns1.regzone.cz
ns1.regzone.de
ns1.regzone.info
SOA:Serial: 2025010904, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:84ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript, SVG graphics, and CSS3 for styling. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, providing a good user experience. However, no CMS or backend platform was explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with no obvious issues but could benefit from further optimization. The lack of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or hosting provider details. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for security and performance improvements.
Analyze Another Website