Is palidzesimotram.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation
Check if palidzesimotram.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website palidzesimotram.lv currently serves as a security gateway page powered by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA challenge to verify they are not automated bots. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security service to mitigate cyber threats and automated abuse. The page content is minimal and focused solely on security validation rather than providing business or informational content. The presence of outdated CMS references (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) in meta tags suggests legacy technology usage, which may pose security risks if these platforms are actively used beyond this gateway. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, but lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which impacts privacy compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture through CAPTCHA enforcement but lacks transparency and business information, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Due to the nature of the page as a security challenge, no direct business information, contact details, or company branding beyond BitNinja is present. The site appears to be a protective layer rather than a commercial or informational website. The business model revolves around cybersecurity and bot mitigation services, likely provided by or in partnership with BitNinja. There is no evidence of revenue streams, partnerships, or market positioning from the content. The target audience is general internet users attempting to access the underlying protected content. The lack of contact or policy pages suggests limited direct customer engagement on this page.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture is characterized by the use of BitNinja's greylist and CAPTCHA challenge to prevent automated and malicious traffic. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA v2 is a positive security control. However, the indication of outdated CMS versions in meta tags is a concern, as these versions are known to have vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, and there is no explicit evidence of HTTPS enforcement or HSTS. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. The site effectively blocks direct access until CAPTCHA validation, which is a strong security measure, but overall security hygiene could be improved by updating software and adding security headers.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Update all CMS platforms and underlying software to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
BitNinja Detected
The website is a security challenge page served by BitNinja, requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed, indicating a WAF/security gateway blocking direct access.
Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Business Insights
This website is a security gateway page that requires visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. It is designed to block automated or malicious traffic and protect the underlying site from cyber threats.
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
poor
Security Assessment
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation
- IP greylisting and delisting process
- Security check page to prevent automated abuse
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is not a typical content site but a security CAPTCHA gateway
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 49 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings