Skip to main content

Is pamatubuve.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA "Mix Max" Reviews

pamatubuve.lv favicon

Is pamatubuve.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA "Mix Max"

Check if pamatubuve.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommercejQueryBootstrapSelect2+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:52:11 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website pamatubuve.lv represents a small Latvian company, SIA Mix Max, specializing in the sale and consultation of screw piles and foundation solutions for various construction needs. The business targets construction professionals and homeowners in Latvia, offering a range of galvanized steel screw piles suitable for different soil types and applications. The site is well-branded and provides clear contact information, including phone numbers, email addresses, and a physical address in Riga. It also offers downloadable catalogs and consultation request forms, enhancing customer engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and slick carousel for UI components. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. However, some technical improvements could be made, such as implementing security headers and configuring analytics properly. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating basic compliance with GDPR. No explicit security policies or incident response information is present, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a niche construction materials supplier in Latvia. Strategic improvements in security policies, WHOIS transparency, and analytics configuration would enhance its digital maturity and compliance posture.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommercejQueryBootstrapSelect2Slick CarouselMakeCommerce payment gateway

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Pamatubuve.lv operates in a niche market segment focused on screw pile foundations, serving primarily Latvian construction companies and individual homeowners. The business model combines e-commerce sales with consultation services, supported by downloadable product catalogs and direct contact options. The company, legally known as SIA Mix Max, appears to maintain a focused local presence with social media engagement on Instagram and Facebook. The partnership or parent relationship with Mix Max suggests a stable business foundation. The website's content and structure indicate a growth-oriented approach with emphasis on product quality and customer support. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency and limited security policy disclosures may pose challenges in building broader market trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

b*****@pamatubuve.lv
i*****@mixmax.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712929****
+3716721****

Physical Addresses (1)

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA "Mix Max"

VAT Number:

LV40103263078

Registration Number:

40103263078

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and privacy mechanisms in place, including a cookie consent banner and privacy policy. Contact forms include privacy agreement checkboxes, which is a positive compliance indicator. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency in handling security events. The WHOIS data unavailability due to query limits is a minor concern for domain legitimacy verification. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could benefit from enhancements in security best practices and policy disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA "Mix Max"

Description:

Skrūvpāļi - Mūsdienīgi pamati dažādām būvēm, karoga mastiem, angāriem, pirtīm un pat mājām. Plašs karsti cinkotu skrūvpāļu klāsts ar dažādiem profiliem, garumiem un pielietojumu.

Key Services:
Sale of screw pilesConsultations on foundation solutionsDelivery and installation services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommercejQueryBootstrapSelect2Slick CarouselMakeCommerce payment gateway
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Privacy policy and cookie consent implemented
  • Contact forms with privacy checkbox

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:pamatubuve.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/15/2025 (46 days)
SANs:pamatubuve.lv, *.pamatubuve.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.64.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.32.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.16.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001
Name Servers:
maya.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
will.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2378149742, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:210ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, leveraging popular libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, and Slick Carousel for UI and interactivity. The site loads resources from trusted CDNs like jsdelivr.net and uses a MakeCommerce payment gateway plugin. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with comprehensive meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and some analytics configurations are incomplete. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but has room for security and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website