Skip to main content

Is paperclip.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Paperclip Labs Reviews

paperclip.xyz favicon

Is paperclip.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Paperclip Labs

Check if paperclip.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google AnalyticsHotjarFramer
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 8:06:16 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Paperclip Labs is a specialized design and development firm focused on serving the crypto and web3 sectors. Founded in 2020, the company positions itself as a top-tier partner for crypto and web3 teams seeking to design, build, and ship innovative products and tools. The website reflects a modern and professional digital presence built using the Framer platform, with integration of analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar to monitor user engagement. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust in the technology sector. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsHotjarFramer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets crypto and web3 teams, offering design and development services that cater to the rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem. Its market positioning as a boutique, high-quality service provider is supported by a clean, well-branded website. The business model appears to be consultancy and product development services, with no direct e-commerce or product sales evident. The absence of detailed contact information and compliance documentation may limit trust for some prospective clients. The company operates independently without visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The domain age and registration details align well with the company's founding date, supporting legitimacy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain status clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in security transparency. Tracking technologies are used, but no cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy is present, indicating potential compliance issues with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Paperclip Labs

Description:

Paperclip Labs works with the top crypto and web3 teams to design, build and ship amazing products and tools.

Key Services:
designbuildship products and tools for crypto and web3
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsHotjarFramer
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Hotjar
Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern design framework Framer.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(223 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.223.52.2, 35.71.142.77
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1741981651, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and responsive design techniques. It integrates Google Analytics and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. The domain is registered with Namecheap and uses their DNS servers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards are properly configured. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for modern web security. No CMS beyond Framer is detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but can benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website