Skip to main content

Is papers.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - Papers AG Reviews

papers.ch favicon

Is papers.ch Safe? Security Analysis for Papers AG

Check if papers.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologySwitzerlandsmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryFontAwesome+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:21:17 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Papers AG operates as a specialized web3 venture studio based in Switzerland, focusing on software engineering and venture development within blockchain, cryptography, and online security sectors. The company supports the entire lifecycle of innovative web3 products, from concept to market fit, targeting developers and founders in the web3 ecosystem. Their business model leverages in-house talent and investment partnerships to build and scale ventures. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a clear portfolio of projects and active social media engagement.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryFontAwesomeRoyalSliderMagnific Popup

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a niche player in the emerging web3 venture space, emphasizing high-tech talent and secure product development. Their portfolio includes partnerships with notable blockchain projects, indicating a strong ecosystem presence. The business model combines talent placement, product development, and investment support, catering to startups and founders seeking to launch and scale web3 ventures. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled engagement via contact forms or specific channels. Growth indicators include a modern website, active social media, and a curated portfolio.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, reflecting a good baseline security posture. However, the lack of security headers and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, which may affect compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for enhancements in policy publication and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Papers AG

Description:

Papers is a web3 venture studio founded on high-tech talent. They support the entire lifecycle of innovative web3 products from concept development to company growth.

Key Services:
Software engineeringVenture developmentTalent placementProduct developmentInvestment partnership
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryFontAwesomeRoyalSliderMagnific Popup
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "strict-origin-when-cross-origin, strict-origin-when-cross-origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:eu.zcsend.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.sui-inter.net include:_spf.google.com include:one.zoho.eu +mx +a -all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:contact@papers.ch
Forensic Reports:contact@papers.ch

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:94.126.17.100
Name Servers:
ch.pro.ioDNS only
nl.pro.ioDNS only
p.dnh.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: papers-ch.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025021401, TTL: 1440s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:322ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:eu.zcsend.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.sui-inter.net include:_spf.google.com include:one.zoho.eu +mx +a -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using modern plugins like Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a mature CMS infrastructure. The tech stack includes jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements, with additional libraries for sliders and popups. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. No hosting provider details were detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, suggesting minimal user tracking. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated further by updating security headers and improving privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website