Skip to main content

Is paradisec.org.au a Scam? Security Check Results - PARADISEC Reviews

P

Is paradisec.org.au Safe? Security Analysis for PARADISEC

Check if paradisec.org.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationAustraliamedium
WordPress CMSjQueryBootstrapSlider Revolution pluginUltimate Premium Plugin+5 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:31:01 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

PARADISEC is a reputable academic consortium comprising the University of Sydney, University of Melbourne, and Australian National University, dedicated to preserving endangered languages and cultures primarily in the Pacific region. The organization digitizes and archives extensive audio and video recordings, providing access and preservation services to communities and researchers. The website reflects a strong market position supported by multiple awards and certifications, emphasizing cultural preservation and academic research. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, offering good mobile responsiveness and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain transparency but not detracting from the site's trustworthiness given its academic backing. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, serving a specialized non-profit educational sector.

Detected Technologies

WordPress CMSjQueryBootstrapSlider Revolution pluginUltimate Premium PluginResponsive Accordion and Collapse pluginTabs Responsive pluginUltimate Social Media Icons pluginMax Mega Menu pluginGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

PARADISEC operates as a non-profit consortium focused on endangered language archiving, leveraging partnerships with major Australian universities and national research bodies. Its business model relies on grant funding, academic collaboration, and public donations facilitated via PayPal. The target audience includes researchers, cultural communities, and academics interested in language preservation. The organization demonstrates competitive advantages through its extensive digital archive, recognized certifications, and active participation in national projects like the Language Data Commons of Australia. Growth indicators include recent awards and ongoing digitisation initiatives. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving universities, research councils, and cultural organizations, enhancing credibility and outreach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Use of security plugins such as Wordfence is indicated, enhancing protection. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in compliance and transparency. No forms collecting sensitive data without validation were detected, reducing risk exposure. Overall, the security maturity is good for a non-profit academic site but could be improved by formalizing policies and disclosure channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

PARADISEC

Description:

PARADISEC is a consortium of three universities (University of Sydney, University of Melbourne, Australian National University) focused on digitising and archiving endangered languages and cultural materials, primarily from the Pacific region. They hold extensive audio and video recordings representing over 1,370 languages and provide access and preservation services to communities and cultural agencies.

Key Services:
Digitisation and archiving of analog audio/video recordingsMetadata cataloguing and rights managementBackup and data preservation services for cultural agenciesCollaboration with national projects like Language Data Commons of AustraliaEducational conferences and podcasts
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress CMSjQueryBootstrapSlider Revolution pluginUltimate Premium PluginResponsive Accordion and Collapse pluginTabs Responsive pluginUltimate Social Media Icons pluginMax Mega Menu pluginGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks:
GeneratePress WordPress theme
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., Wordfence indicated by script)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data without validation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Ultimate Social Media IconsGoogle Site Kit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a well-maintained academic/non-profit archive for endangered languages.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf-short.sydney.edu.au include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

13 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Slow DNS Resolution

LOW

DNS resolution took 1125ms (>1000ms)

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:128.250.225.203
Name Servers:
dns-1.sydney.edu.au
dns-2.sydney.edu.au
extro.ucc.usyd.edu.au
metro.ucc.usyd.edu.au
MX Records:
10: au-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
10: au-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 17125, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:1125ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf-short.sydney.edu.au include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the GeneratePress theme and a suite of well-known plugins for functionality such as sliders, social media integration, and responsive design. The tech stack includes jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slider Revolution, providing a rich user experience with multimedia content. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS and Google Analytics for tracking. Technical risks are minimal but include potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated.
Analyze Another Website