Is parapsiholog.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Парапсихология и эзотерика
Check if parapsiholog.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website www.parapsiholog.lv is dedicated to parapsychology and esoterics, providing educational content, association information, and consultation services primarily targeting Russian and Latvian speaking audiences interested in these niche fields. The site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Slider Revolution, WPML for multilingual support, and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The technical infrastructure is moderate with a responsive design and standard frameworks like Bootstrap. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site appears legitimate and safe, but improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices are recommended.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The site operates in a niche educational and association sector focused on esoterics and parapsychology. It likely functions as a small non-profit or educational entity serving a specialized community in Latvia and Russian-speaking regions. The business model revolves around providing courses, consultations, and archival content. The market position is niche with limited competition. The site uses multilingual support to broaden reach. No clear revenue streams or parent company affiliations are evident. The partnership ecosystem includes references to international and Latvian associations in the field. Growth indicators and certifications are not visible, suggesting a small-scale operation.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and includes Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating basic security awareness. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web attacks. The WordPress version is outdated (4.8.25), which may pose vulnerabilities if not patched. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Website related to parapsychology and esoterics, including associations and educational centers in these fields.
good
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Google reCAPTCHA included
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Weak DKIM Key
HIGHDKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 65 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM50 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings