Skip to main content

Is pardzivot.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Par Dzīvot Reviews

pardzivot.lv favicon

Is pardzivot.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Par Dzīvot

Check if pardzivot.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:32:17 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Par Dzīvot is a Latvian non-profit mutual support organization dedicated to providing psychological, informational, and practical assistance to oncology patients and their relatives across Latvia. The website is professionally designed using the Weblium platform and targets a specific audience of individuals affected by cancer diagnoses. The content is primarily in Latvian and Russian, reflecting the local demographic. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and includes a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, indicating some level of privacy awareness. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, and contact information limits transparency and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration, suggesting room for improvement in protecting user data and communications. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, restricting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site serves its niche audience well but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy, and contact disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on oncology patient support in Latvia. Its business model revolves around mutual aid and community support rather than commercial activities. The website positions itself as a key resource for newly diagnosed cancer patients and those undergoing or having completed treatment. The lack of visible contact details and formal policies may reflect a small organizational size or limited digital maturity. The site leverages partnerships with Weblium for website building and Cookiebot for cookie management, but no other partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. Growth potential may depend on increasing transparency and expanding digital engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

p*****@gmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic. The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party scripts like Cookiebot introduces some privacy compliance but also potential tracking risks. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear contact points for security incidents to enhance resilience and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Par Dzīvot

Description:

“Par Dzīvot” ir savstarpējās palīdzības biedrība onkoloģijas pacientiem un viņu tuviniekiem. Mēs piedāvājam psiholoģisku, informatīvu un praktisku atbalstu visā Latvijā.

Key Services:
psychological supportinformational supportpractical assistance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Frameworks:
Weblium website builder
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.187.82.108
Name Servers:
ns1.weblium.comDNS only
ns2.weblium.comDNS only
ns3.weblium.comDNS only
ns4.weblium.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025050701, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:130ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Weblium CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It includes cookie consent management via Cookiebot, indicating some privacy compliance efforts. Performance appears moderate with preloading of CSS and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small non-profit but could benefit from enhanced security and transparency measures.
Analyze Another Website