Skip to main content

Is parking-crew.com a Scam? Security Check Results - parking-crew.com Reviews

P

Is parking-crew.com Safe? Security Analysis for parking-crew.com

Check if parking-crew.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseAmazon CloudFront CDN
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 7:27:05 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website parking-crew.com is a parked domain primarily serving advertising content with no substantive business information or services presented. The domain has been registered since 2011 through a reputable registrar but lacks any clear business identity or contact details on the site. The technical infrastructure relies on basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with third-party advertising and tracking scripts from Google Adsense, DoubleClick, and Youseasky. There is no evidence of HTTPS usage or security headers, and no forms or user inputs are present. Privacy compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy accessible via a JavaScript popup and no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site appears to be a placeholder domain monetized through ads rather than an active business website.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseAmazon CloudFront CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain does not present any identifiable business entity or services, indicating it is likely held for parking or resale purposes. There are no contact details, social media links, or trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials. The business model appears to be advertising-based domain parking. The lack of business information and minimal content suggest no active market positioning or competitive advantage. The domain age is consistent with a long-registered domain but does not correlate with an active business presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no indication of HTTPS usage or SSL certificates, which is a critical security flaw. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. The site uses multiple third-party advertising and tracking scripts without any visible cookie consent or privacy controls, raising privacy compliance concerns. No incident response or security policies are published. The absence of secure forms or input validation further reduces security maturity. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security risks and lacks basic protections.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a parked domain landing page with advertising content and no substantive business description.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseAmazon CloudFront CDN
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseDoubleClickYouseasky
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense cookie.jsYouseasky tracking scripts
Marketing Tools:
Google AdsenseYouseasky AdsDeli
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain with no substantive business content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: 62.116.130.8

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(271 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.53.179.30
Name Servers:
ns-1062.awsdns-04.org
ns-176.awsdns-22.com
ns-1918.awsdns-47.co.uk
ns-725.awsdns-26.net
MX Records:
10: 62.116.130.8
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and relies heavily on third-party ad networks and tracking services. Hosting is via Amazon CloudFront CDN, which provides reliable content delivery. The site lacks modern web frameworks or CMS platforms and shows minimal optimization for mobile or accessibility. Performance is moderate but could be improved by reducing external script dependencies. The absence of SEO meta tags and structured data limits search engine visibility. Technical debt is low due to minimal content but modernization opportunities exist to improve security, privacy, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website