Is parkingbox.lv Safe? Security Analysis for ParkingBox
Check if parkingbox.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
ParkingBox is a Latvian small business specializing in metal storage boxes and custom storage solutions, targeting residential property owners and real estate developers. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a mature digital infrastructure suitable for e-commerce. The site employs standard tracking and advertising technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google AdSense. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
ParkingBox operates in the niche market of metal storage solutions with a focus on both individual consumers and real estate developers. Their business model combines e-commerce sales with installation and delivery services. The company appears to be relatively new (founded in 2021) and small in size, with a consistent brand presence and good content quality. The use of WooCommerce and Elementor suggests a flexible and scalable platform. The absence of detailed business contact information and privacy policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data leaks were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA scripts, which help mitigate automated abuse. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and readiness. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
ParkingBox
Izvēlies Parking Box kā praktisku un efektīvu uzglabāšanas risinājumu, neatkarīgi no tā, vai dzīvo privātmājā vai dzīvoklī.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA script
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 56 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings