Skip to main content

Is parochne.com a Scam? Security Check Results - TOSIN, s.r.o. Reviews

parochne.com favicon

Is parochne.com Safe? Security Analysis for TOSIN, s.r.o.

Check if parochne.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailSlovakiasmall
Google FontsjQueryOwl CarouselFont AwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 10:17:06 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Parochne.com is an e-commerce and retail business specializing in wigs, hair extensions, and related hair care products, operating primarily in Slovakia with multiple physical store locations. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting general consumers interested in hair solutions. The technical infrastructure includes modern UI libraries and Google services, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with use of HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks explicit security headers and privacy policy documentation. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite active website presence. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for retail customers but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsjQueryOwl CarouselFont AwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on wigs and hair extensions, serving Slovak customers through both online and physical stores. The business model is direct retail with a focus on specialized hair products. The presence of multiple store locations and active social media indicates a stable regional market position. Lack of detailed business registration data and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in corporate transparency. The website's clean design and product presentation support customer engagement, but absence of email contacts and formal policies may limit trust for some users.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No forms were detected in the provided HTML, limiting exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. The missing WHOIS data and lack of privacy policy are compliance and trust concerns. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, indicating low maturity in security governance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TOSIN, s.r.o.

Description:

Parochňové štúdio Lilly offers wigs, clip-in hair extensions, hair care products, eyebrow makeup, and hairpieces.

Key Services:
WigsHair extensions (clip-in)HairpiecesHair care productsEyebrow makeup
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsjQueryOwl CarouselFont AwesomeGoogle reCAPTCHA
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.nameserver.sk -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:157.180.7.23
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsbackup.netDNS only
ns1.nameserver.skDNS only
ns2.dnsbackup.netDNS only
ns2.nameserver.skDNS only
MX Records:
5: mailin.mx-hub.cz
5: mailin.mx-hub.eu
5: mailin.mx-hub.sk
5: mailin.mx-hub.net
SOA:Serial: 2025061701, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:107ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.nameserver.sk -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Google Fonts, jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Font Awesome icons. It employs Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and navigation. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. Performance is moderate with no major errors or broken elements. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement.
Analyze Another Website