Skip to main content

Is partneribas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - partneribas.lv Reviews

P

Is partneribas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if partneribas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:21:21 PM
37
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at partneribas.lv is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page with no accessible content. Due to this, no business information, metadata, or technical details about the site could be extracted. The WHOIS lookup failed due to query limits, preventing extraction of domain registration details. This lack of data severely limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or digital maturity. Technically, the site lacks HTTPS and security headers, indicating a weak security posture. Overall, the site appears either restricted or misconfigured, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence could be gathered from the website content or WHOIS data. The absence of contact information, policies, or company details prevents analysis of market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model insights. The domain's legitimacy and operational status remain unclear due to lack of accessible data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and accessible content. No evidence of incident response contacts, security policies, or vulnerability disclosures was found. The 403 Forbidden error may indicate restrictive access controls but also limits transparency and user trust. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, further complicating trust assessment. Overall, the site exhibits a low security maturity level with significant gaps in compliance and protection.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content indicating access is blocked or restricted. No specific WAF vendor identified.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
10/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

15/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.150 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.20 +ip4:91.203.70.20 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.70.20
Name Servers:
ns.firsthost.lvDNS only
ns2.firsthost.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: partneribas.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072802, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.150 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.20 +ip4:91.203.70.20 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal 403 Forbidden error page with no metadata, scripts, or content. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates outdated or incomplete technical configuration. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site likely requires technical remediation to restore accessibility and improve security posture.
Analyze Another Website