Skip to main content

Is passer-by.com a Scam? Security Check Results - passer-by.com Reviews

passer-by.com favicon

Is passer-by.com Safe? Security Analysis for 路人甲 · Passer-by

Check if passer-by.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Adsense+1 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:28:31 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Passer-by.com is a personal website and blog primarily focused on front-end web development, showcasing projects and sharing web component development insights. The site targets web developers and technology enthusiasts interested in JavaScript and jQuery plugins. It operates as a small-scale personal platform without commercial business operations or extensive corporate infrastructure. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Google Adsense for monetization and 51.la for analytics. The hosting is provided by a Chinese registrar, consistent with the website's language and regional focus. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating low compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the site is functional and professionally presented but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Adsense51.la Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a personal technical blog with a niche audience of front-end developers. Its market position is that of an individual contributor rather than a commercial entity. Revenue is likely generated through Google Adsense advertising. The absence of formal business contact information and policies suggests a non-commercial or hobbyist model. The site has a stable domain registration since 2011, indicating longevity and consistency. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries. The content is focused on technical sharing rather than product sales or services, limiting its market scope but enhancing its credibility within its niche.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No forms or input fields are present to assess input sanitization or secure data handling. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and privacy compliance measures to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

路人甲个人网站,展示前端开发作品,致力于web开发组件化,Keep It Simple,Stupid

Key Services:
前端开发作品展示web开发组件化分享jQuery插件及JavaScript资源
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Adsense51.la Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Basic input validation script to prevent http:// in URL parameters

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
51.la
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Tracking Pixels:
51.la
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal blog focused on front-end development and web components.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:passer-by.com
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:9/24/2025 (51 days)
SANs:passer-by.com, www.passer-by.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.111.153, 185.199.109.153, 185.199.108.153, 185.199.110.153
AAAA Records:2606:50c0:8002::153, 2606:50c0:8003::153, 2606:50c0:8000::153, 2606:50c0:8001::153
Name Servers:
ns1.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns2.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns3.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns4.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns5.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns6.myhostadmin.netDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:452ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard web technologies and includes external scripts for advertising and analytics. The domain is hosted by a Chinese registrar with no CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with some dynamic background image loading. Mobile optimization is basic with some responsive CSS. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. No forms or interactive input elements are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement features. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, representing technical debt and potential risk. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could be modernized and hardened.
Analyze Another Website