Skip to main content

Is pastaigas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA PASTAIGAS Reviews

pastaigas.lv favicon

Is pastaigas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA PASTAIGAS

Check if pastaigas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressTawk.to live chatGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:57:42 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Pastaigas.lv is a small Latvian business specializing in publishing walking guide books for cities such as Liepāja and Rīga. The website serves as a platform to showcase their products and provide updates related to walking tours. The company maintains an active social media presence across Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram, enhancing its outreach to local and tourist audiences interested in city exploration. The business model focuses on niche publishing and local tourism promotion. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and integrates a live chat service (Tawk.to) for customer interaction. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance documentation, indicating room for improvement in security posture and regulatory adherence. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its business scope but should enhance privacy and security measures to improve compliance and user trust.

Detected Technologies

WordPressTawk.to live chatGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche market focused on local walking tours and guidebooks, targeting tourists and residents interested in exploring Latvian cities. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content and multi-channel social media engagement. The business model is straightforward, relying on book sales and content updates. There is no indication of large-scale operations or subsidiaries, suggesting a small business size. The absence of detailed business registration data and privacy policies suggests a need for formalization and compliance improvements. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media platforms and third-party chat services. Growth potential exists in expanding digital content and enhancing online presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@pastaigas.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712655****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response policies, or security certifications was found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, which is critical given the EU jurisdiction. The use of third-party scripts like Tawk.to should be regularly audited for security risks. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring enhancements to protect user data and comply with legal requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA PASTAIGAS

Description:

The website offers books and content related to walking tours in Latvian cities such as Liepāja and Rīga. It appears to be a small business focused on publishing or promoting walking guides.

Key Services:
Publishing walking guide booksProviding news and updates related to walking tours
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressTawk.to live chatGoogle Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based small business site focused on walking guide books.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

15 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.74.196
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:120ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, using the Minimalistix theme and integrates Google Fonts and Tawk.to live chat. The HTML is valid and well-structured, with responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and structured data beyond basic HTML. No analytics services are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of forms reduces data collection risks but also limits user engagement options. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website