Is patrickmason.studio Safe? Security Analysis for Patrick Mason Studio
Check if patrickmason.studio is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Patrick Mason Studio is a small, professional design studio based in Eora (Sydney), Australia, specializing in partnering with cultural, commercial, and individual clients to create engaging and memorable designs. The website serves as a portfolio and contact point, showcasing the studio's creative work and collaborators. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Gatsby, React, and Tailwind CSS, resulting in a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible website experience. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies, which are important for compliance and trust. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or incident response information, and WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for small businesses but limits transparency. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The studio operates in the creative design sector, targeting cultural, commercial, and individual clients primarily in Australia. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on bespoke design partnerships. The website positions the studio as a niche player with a consistent brand and good content quality. There is no evidence of large-scale operations or subsidiaries. The absence of social media links and detailed business information suggests a boutique operation. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may limit trust for privacy-conscious clients. The studio could improve market positioning by adding certifications, testimonials, and clearer business credentials.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed from the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies, which are important for handling security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via security headers.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Patrick Mason Studio
Patrick Mason partners with cultural, commercial and individual clients to create engaging and memorable designs. Based in Eora (Sydney), Australia.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional design studio portfolio
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 55 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings