Skip to main content

Is pbsnetaccess.com a Scam? Security Check Results - pbsnetaccess.com Reviews

P

Is pbsnetaccess.com Safe? Security Analysis for pbsnetaccess.com

Check if pbsnetaccess.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Incapsula
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:13:19 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.pbsnetaccess.com is currently inaccessible due to blocking by the Incapsula Web Application Firewall (WAF). The WHOIS lookup for the domain returned no registration data, indicating the domain may not be registered or is very recently registered. Due to the lack of accessible content, no metadata, business information, or contact details could be extracted. The site does not provide any visible privacy, cookie, or security policies, nor does it show any forms or external links. This severely limits the ability to assess the business model, technical infrastructure, or security posture. The presence of the Incapsula WAF blocking suggests some level of security protection, but without accessible content, no further security evaluation is possible.

Detected Technologies

Incapsula

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be derived from the site due to the absence of accessible content and lack of WHOIS registration information. There are no indications of company name, sector, services, or market positioning. The domain's unregistered or unknown status raises concerns about legitimacy and operational status.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed as the website content is blocked by Incapsula WAF. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available. The domain's lack of registration data further reduces trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the security maturity appears minimal or unknown.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is complete and accurate.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Incapsula Detected

Website content is blocked by Incapsula WAF, displaying an iframe with an incident ID and no accessible content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Incapsula

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to Incapsula WAF blocking.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:148.163.129.49 ip4:192.174.91.145 include:sparkpostmail.com include:_spf.sparkpostmail.com include:bounces.input1.com a:dispatch-us.ppe-hosted.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@pbsnetaccess.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@pbsnetaccess.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(248 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:107.154.79.166, 45.60.100.166
Name Servers:
ns11.constellix.com
ns21.constellix.com
ns31.constellix.com
ns41.constellix.net
ns51.constellix.net
ns61.constellix.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:148.163.129.49 ip4:192.174.91.145 include:sparkpostmail.com include:_spf.sparkpostmail.com include:bounces.input1.com a:dispatch-us.ppe-hosted.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Incapsula WAF for protection, which currently blocks access to the site content. No other technologies, CMS, or frameworks could be detected due to lack of accessible HTML content. The site lacks metadata, structured data, and visible scripts beyond the WAF resource. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be evaluated. The technical infrastructure appears minimal or incomplete.
Analyze Another Website