Skip to main content

Is pdst.fm a Scam? Security Check Results - pdst.fm Reviews

P

Is pdst.fm Safe? Security Analysis for pdst.fm

https://pdst.fm

Check if pdst.fm is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 11:08:06 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain pdst.fm is registered since 2018 with a reputable registrar, Abion AB, and is currently active with a valid expiry date in 2026. However, the website content is inaccessible, returning only a minimal 404 error page with no metadata, structured data, or business information. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present, and no contact information or social media links are available. The technical infrastructure appears minimal, with DNS hosted on Google Cloud DNS servers but no detectable CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement and missing security headers. Overall, the site lacks professionalism and trustworthiness due to the absence of meaningful content and compliance indicators.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business information or company details are available on the website or in the HTML content. The domain registration data does not provide registrant organization details to correlate with any business claims. The lack of contact information, policies, or services suggests the site is either inactive, under development, or abandoned. There are no indications of market positioning, target audience, or business model from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal and insufficient. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, and no HTTPS enforcement or security headers are detected. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations. These factors collectively represent a high risk for users and reduce trust in the domain.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible beyond a 404 error page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:pdst.fm
Issuer:WR3
Valid Until:11/13/2025 (40 days)
SANs:pdst.fm

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(314 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:216.239.32.21, 216.239.34.21, 216.239.36.21, 216.239.38.21
AAAA Records:2001:4860:4802:38::15, 2001:4860:4802:32::15, 2001:4860:4802:36::15, 2001:4860:4802:34::15
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:156ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a 404 error page with minimal HTML content and no metadata or structured data. DNS is hosted on Google Cloud DNS, indicating reliable infrastructure, but no CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools are detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance cannot be fully assessed due to lack of content. The technical implementation is basic and requires significant development to meet modern web standards and security best practices.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about pdst.fm

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website