Skip to main content

Is pears.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Tether Data, S.A. de C.V. Reviews

pears.com favicon

Is pears.com Safe? Security Analysis for Tether Data, S.A. de C.V.

Check if pears.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptVideo.jsLocomotive Scroll
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:01:24 PM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Pears.com is a technology-focused website offering an innovative open-source peer-to-peer (P2P) runtime framework designed to empower developers to build scalable, infrastructure-free P2P applications. The company behind the site, Tether Data, S.A. de C.V., has a long-standing domain registration dating back to 1998, indicating a mature and established presence. The website features rich multimedia content, including videos and showcases, targeting developers and technology innovators interested in P2P solutions. The business model centers on providing a developer framework and fostering a community ecosystem with partnerships such as Tether and Holepunch. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies like Video.js and Locomotive Scroll for enhanced user experience. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, uses HTTPS, and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility and SEO practices. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and some security headers are missing, which could be improved to enhance security posture. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. There is no explicit security policy or incident response information published, and no security.txt file is found. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The absence of contact emails or phone numbers suggests contact is primarily via web forms. Overall, Pears.com presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-designed platform with a strong focus on developer empowerment in the P2P space. Security practices are adequate but could be enhanced with DNSSEC and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with privacy and cookie policies present but no explicit GDPR compliance statements. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding security headers to strengthen the security posture.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptVideo.jsLocomotive Scroll

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Pears.com operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on peer-to-peer application development frameworks. Its competitive advantage lies in offering an infrastructure-free, scalable runtime environment that democratizes app development. The business targets developers and innovators seeking to disrupt traditional centralized models. Revenue streams likely include ecosystem partnerships and possibly support or consulting services, though not explicitly stated. The company maintains strategic partnerships with Tether and Holepunch, enhancing its ecosystem credibility. Growth indicators include active showcases and developer documentation. The company appears small but mature, with a long domain history and consistent branding. The partnership ecosystem supports innovation and market penetration in the P2P niche.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site does not publish a security.txt file or provide direct security contact channels, which limits incident response readiness. Compliance with GDPR is not explicitly stated, and privacy policies are basic. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a technology framework provider but would benefit from enhanced DNS security, formalized policies, and transparency in security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Tether Data, S.A. de C.V.

Description:

Pears offers an open-source P2P runtime framework empowering developers to build peer-to-peer applications without traditional infrastructure constraints. It focuses on scalability, user experience, democratizing app development, and fostering innovation.

Key Services:
P2P runtime frameworkDeveloper documentationShowcase applications
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptVideo.jsLocomotive Scroll
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:pears.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/24/2025 (49 days)
SANs:pears.com, *.pears.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(33 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.134.42, 162.159.135.42
AAAA Records:2606:4700:7::a29f:872a, 2606:4700:7::a29f:862a
Name Servers:
rick.ns.cloudflare.com
vera.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381034539, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Video.js for video playback and Locomotive Scroll for smooth scrolling effects. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare, providing DNS resilience and performance benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some heavy multimedia content but generally good loading behavior. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve trust.
Analyze Another Website