
Is penam.sk Safe? Security Analysis for PENAM, a.s.
Check if penam.sk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
PENAM, a.s. is a leading bakery manufacturer in Central Europe, specializing in bakery and milling products with a tradition dating back to 1992. The company targets general consumers interested in quality bakery goods and offers a broad product range including premium bakery lines and recipes. The website reflects a mature digital presence with e-commerce capabilities and active social media engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager, ensuring good SEO and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
PENAM holds a strong market position as a major bakery producer in Slovakia and Central Europe, supported by a large product portfolio and premium brand lines. The business model focuses on manufacturing and direct consumer sales via an e-shop, complemented by content marketing through recipes and a magazine. The company benefits from partnerships and likely parent company Agrofert, enhancing its market reach. The website's comprehensive content and clear contact information support customer trust and engagement. Growth indicators include active content updates and social media presence.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent with granular controls, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of security headers like CSP or HSTS is a minor gap. The use of third-party scripts is controlled via Google Tag Manager, reducing risk. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with formal policies and additional headers.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
PENAM, a.s.
Patříme k předním pekárenským výrobcům ve střední Evropě. V našem sortimentu najdete pekárenské a mlýnské produkty s tradicí již od roku 1992.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent with granular controls
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 56 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings