Skip to main content

Is pendereckisgarden.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - pendereckisgarden.pl Reviews

pendereckisgarden.pl favicon

Is pendereckisgarden.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Penderecki's Garden

Check if pendereckisgarden.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherPolandsmall
Google Web FontsGoogle Tag ManagerWebFont Loader
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:02:13 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Penderecki's Garden is a small-scale cultural or garden-related website based in Poland, established in 2020. The site offers a visually appealing experience with a focus on harmony and cultural exploration, targeting a general audience interested in cultural or natural spaces. The technical infrastructure includes modern web fonts and Google Analytics for visitor tracking, hosted by home.pl S.A., a Polish hosting provider. While the site demonstrates good design and mobile optimization, it lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is limited due to missing security headers and DNSSEC not being enabled. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security to improve trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

Google Web FontsGoogle Tag ManagerWebFont Loader

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website appears to serve as an informational or promotional platform for Penderecki's Garden, likely a cultural or natural attraction in Poland. The business model seems focused on cultural engagement or tourism, though explicit commercial activities are not evident. The domain registration aligns with the Polish location, supporting legitimacy. The absence of detailed business information, contact details, or certifications limits deeper business intelligence insights. The use of Google Analytics indicates an interest in visitor metrics, suggesting a growth or engagement focus. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the website is basic. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are essential for modern web security. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. There is no evidence of incident response policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR. The site uses Google Analytics, which requires proper consent mechanisms to be GDPR compliant, but no such mechanisms are found. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to enhance security and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A place of perfect harmony. Explore Penderecki’s Garden.

Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Web FontsGoogle Tag ManagerWebFont Loader
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:7b9c378c3fc94834bdfdcb64c1d4a04c@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:pendereckisgarden.pl
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:1/1/2026 (89 days)
SANs:pendereckisgarden.pl, *.pendereckisgarden.pl

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(205 days)

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.204.161, 104.21.85.108
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3031::6815:556c, 2606:4700:3033::ac43:cca1
Name Servers:
abby.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
josh.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: mail.iam.pl
SOA:Serial: 2384975806, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern web fonts loaded via Google Web Fonts and employs Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The hosting provider is home.pl S.A., a reputable Polish registrar and hosting company. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility basics but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts indicating some optimization efforts. The HTML is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). However, the absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or static site. There is no evidence of server-side security configurations or advanced frameworks. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website