Is phoenixlabs.com Safe? Security Analysis for Phoenix Environmental Laboratories
Check if phoenixlabs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Phoenix Environmental Laboratories is a well-established environmental testing laboratory founded in 1998, specializing in soil, water, air, sludge, and solids analysis. The company serves a diverse clientele including consulting firms, municipal partners, engineering firms, and government agencies, offering a range of analytical services compliant with EPA and state regulations. Their market position is that of a trusted regional laboratory with certifications such as NELAC and partnerships with recognized organizations like the US Army Corps of Engineers. Technically, the website is built on legacy ASP.NET WebForms technology with basic JavaScript and jQuery usage. The site is functional but lacks modern design and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with no DNSSEC, no visible security headers, and no explicit HTTPS enforcement in the HTML content, though the domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration history. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is professional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security and privacy practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the environmental testing sector, focusing on analytical laboratory services for environmental samples. Their business model revolves around providing timely and accurate testing with options for priority and emergency services. The target customers include small businesses, large engineering firms, and government agencies, indicating a B2B focus. The company maintains trust through certifications and affiliations but lacks visible marketing or analytics tools on the website. Growth indicators include a long domain age and consistent service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized environmental and governmental bodies, enhancing credibility.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (2)
Phone Numbers (2)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security maturity level is moderate. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces domain and web application security. The website uses HTTPS (assumed from domain but not explicitly confirmed in HTML), but no HSTS or other advanced security headers are detected. Forms use POST method but no visible anti-CSRF tokens or advanced input validation indicators are present. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet modern standards and compliance requirements.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC and implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen domain and web security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Phoenix Environmental Laboratories
Phoenix Environmental Laboratories offers high quality testing of soils, water, sludge, solids and air meeting EPA, state DEP and DOH requirements. They serve a diverse client base including small businesses, large engineering firms, state and federal agencies, providing standard and priority testing services.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Form uses POST method
- Domain status clientDeleteProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website uses legacy ASP.NET WebForms technology.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook, LinkedIn
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings