Skip to main content

Is picumeistarklase.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - picumeistarklase.lv Reviews

P

Is picumeistarklase.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if picumeistarklase.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:31:15 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website picumeistarklase.lv currently serves a security verification page employing Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated access. Due to this bot protection mechanism, the actual website content is inaccessible, limiting the ability to analyze business details or user-facing content. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 5.3.3 and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for enhanced security. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible, and no contact or company information is provided on the landing page. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, preventing verification of domain registration details. This lack of transparency and content accessibility results in a low trust and security posture score. Strategic improvements should focus on enabling legitimate user access, publishing essential compliance documents, and providing clear business contact information.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security verification page blocking content access, no business intelligence data such as company name, market position, or services offered could be extracted. The domain appears to be small scale with no visible branding or trust indicators. The absence of contact details and policies suggests the website is either under development or intentionally restricted to verified users only. No partnerships or related domains were identified from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture by implementing Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated bot access. However, no additional security headers were detected, and SSL/TLS configuration could not be verified. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present. Overall, the security posture is minimal and requires significant enhancements to meet standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification challenge using Google reCAPTCHA v3 indicating WAF or bot protection blocking direct content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a Google reCAPTCHA v3 security verification page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.picumeistarklase.lv
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:9/9/2025 (40 days)
SANs:*.picumeistarklase.lv, picumeistarklase.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.145
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::145
Name Servers:
ns1.stackdns.comDNS only
ns2.stackdns.comDNS only
ns3.stackdns.comDNS only
ns4.stackdns.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1692854621, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:206ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection, indicating some level of modern frontend technology adoption. However, the site is currently inaccessible beyond the security verification page, limiting performance and SEO evaluation. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. Accessibility is basic with minimal content and no navigation structure. The site lacks meta tags beyond the title and viewport settings. Technical debt is unknown due to limited content exposure.
Analyze Another Website