Is pie-mimi.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Sia "Pie Mimi"
Check if pie-mimi.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Pie Mimi is a small Latvian bakery business specializing in baked goods such as specialty cookies. The website presents a basic retail business model targeting local customers interested in bakery products. The company appears to have been founded around 2015 and maintains a modest online presence with social media links and contact information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins for UI enhancements and contact forms. While the site uses HTTPS, it lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, indicating room for improvement in security posture and regulatory adherence. The absence of WHOIS data limits full verification of domain legitimacy, but the website content and contact details suggest a legitimate small business. Overall, the site provides basic information and functionality but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy policies, and richer content to improve trust and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the retail bakery sector in Latvia, focusing on specialty baked products. Its market positioning is local and small scale, with a straightforward business model centered on product sales. The website lacks comprehensive marketing or analytics tools, indicating limited digital marketing sophistication. Partnerships appear limited to the website design agency. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed. The company maintains basic contact channels and social media presence, which supports customer engagement but does not demonstrate advanced digital strategy or ecosystem partnerships.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS but does not implement key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is present. The use of outdated WordPress version (4.1.41) and plugins may expose the site to security risks. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to update software, implement security headers, and establish privacy and incident response policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Sia "Pie Mimi"
A Latvian bakery business offering various baked goods including specialty cookies and other products.
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based bakery site in Latvian language.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 30 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM12 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings