Skip to main content

Is pielipa.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - pielipa.lv Reviews

pielipa.lv favicon

Is pielipa.lv Safe? Security Analysis for pielipa.lv

Check if pielipa.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
Google Tag ManagerSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:39:59 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Pielipa.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in visual advertising services such as light advertising, car wrapping, neon signs, printing, and custom signage solutions. The website showcases a portfolio of their work with multiple galleries and images, targeting businesses and individuals seeking advertising and signage services. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing their market visibility. Technically, the website is built on the Berta.me CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with a clear navigation structure and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and privacy-related policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the retail sector focused on visual advertising and signage production. Their business model is service-oriented, providing customized advertising solutions including light boxes, neon signs, car wraps, and printed materials. The company targets local and regional markets in Latvia, leveraging social media for marketing. The portfolio indicates a diverse range of projects, suggesting flexibility and capability in handling various client needs. Lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact trust and compliance with European regulations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@pielipa.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, there is no evidence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface from injection vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. WHOIS data unavailability restricts verification of domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy disclosures and header configurations to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

pielipa.lv

Description:

Business offers visual advertising services including light advertising, car wrapping, printing, plotter cutting, neon signs, custom works, plaques, brochures, fire safety signs, and tools for gluing.

Key Services:
Gaismas reklāma (Light advertising)Auto aplīmēšana (Car wrapping)Ploteris, druka (Plotter cutting, printing)Neons (Neon signs)Skatlogu, logu aplīmēšana (Window wrapping)Nestandarta darbi (Custom works)Organiskā stikla/metāla burti (Acrylic/metal letters)Brošūras (Brochures)Ugunsdrošības zīmes (Fire safety signs)Instrumenti līmēšanai (Tools for gluing)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Berta.me CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://pielipa.lv/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:inbox.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:206.189.242.57
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
50: mx.inbox.eu
SOA:Serial: 1736947372, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:200ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:inbox.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Berta.me CMS, a specialized platform for portfolio and small business sites. It incorporates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking, and Swiper.js for image galleries. The site loads multiple images optimized for different screen sizes, indicating attention to performance and mobile responsiveness. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information is available. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with meta tags present but no structured data beyond basic JSON-LD for website identity. The site performs moderately well but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements.
Analyze Another Website