Skip to main content

Is pigments.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Color Pigments Manufacturers Association, Inc. Reviews

pigments.org favicon

Is pigments.org Safe? Security Analysis for Color Pigments Manufacturers Association, Inc.

Check if pigments.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingUnited Statessmall
WordPressBootstrapjQueryGoogle AnalyticsMetaSlider plugin+3 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 10:42:26 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Color Pigments Manufacturers Association, Inc. (CPMA) is a well-established industry association serving the color pigments manufacturing sector in North America since 1925. The organization provides advocacy, membership benefits, committee collaboration, and industry resources to its members. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting industry professionals and stakeholders. It offers event information, news updates, and educational resources relevant to the pigments industry. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, leveraging plugins such as MetaSlider and Contact Form 7. It employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced security and privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits full trust verification, but the website's content and contact information support its legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile with good business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response documentation would further strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBootstrapjQueryGoogle AnalyticsMetaSlider pluginContact Form 7Theme My LoginFeedzy RSS Feeds

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CPMA occupies a niche market position as the authoritative voice for the color pigments manufacturing industry in North America. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing history since 1925, strong industry connections, and comprehensive advocacy efforts. The business model focuses on membership services, regulatory influence, and industry collaboration. Revenue streams likely include membership dues, event sponsorships, and educational materials. The target customer segments are pigment manufacturers, processors, and related stakeholders. Growth indicators include active event scheduling and ongoing news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes industry conferences and resource providers. Operationally, CPMA maintains a focused digital presence supporting its advocacy and member engagement objectives.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@cpma.com

Phone Numbers (1)

571*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published incident response or security policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and explicit privacy controls. The site uses reputable plugins and frameworks but should ensure timely updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Color Pigments Manufacturers Association, Inc.

Description:

Serving the Color Pigments Industry since 1925

Key Services:
AdvocacyMembership benefitsIndustry committeesEvents and networkingInformation resources
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBootstrapjQueryGoogle AnalyticsMetaSlider pluginContact Form 7Theme My LoginFeedzy RSS Feeds
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Theme My Login)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(379 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.136.54, 162.159.137.54
Name Servers:
dns1.stabletransit.com
dns2.stabletransit.com
SOA:Serial: 1652461606, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:212ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates several plugins for enhanced functionality including sliders, contact forms, and login management. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and optimized image sizes. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate. Technical debt appears low, though security enhancements and cookie management are recommended to modernize the infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website