Skip to main content

Is pixelwall.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - eliteVISION Reviews

E

Is pixelwall.cz Safe? Security Analysis for eliteVISION

Check if pixelwall.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
jQuery 1.4.2jQuery latestCloud Zoom 1.0.2Flash (YouTube embed)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:34:07 AM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

PixelWall.cz is a small Czech-based business specializing in LED lighting solutions for interior and exterior applications, including decorative, architectural, and stage lighting. The website serves as a promotional platform offering downloadable brochures, demo software, and multimedia showcasing their products. The business targets professionals and companies interested in LED lighting technologies within the Czech and Slovak regions. Technically, the website relies on outdated technologies such as Flash and an old version of jQuery, with no HTTPS or modern security headers implemented, indicating a low level of digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to lack of encryption, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and use of deprecated technologies. No contact information or compliance documentation is provided, which limits trust and business credibility. Overall, the site is functional but basic and requires modernization and security improvements to meet current standards.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.4.2jQuery latestCloud Zoom 1.0.2Flash (YouTube embed)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche market of LED and decorative lighting solutions, leveraging partnerships with related LED and lighting technology providers. The business model appears focused on product promotion and software distribution rather than direct e-commerce. The website's external links to partner domains suggest a collaborative ecosystem within the lighting industry. However, the lack of explicit contact details and compliance documentation may hinder customer trust and limit growth potential. The domain age of over a decade supports business legitimacy but the outdated website technology and minimal digital marketing tools indicate limited investment in digital transformation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a low security maturity level with no HTTPS detected, no security headers, and use of deprecated Flash technology for video content. The inclusion of scripts loaded over HTTP introduces potential man-in-the-middle risks. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. These factors collectively expose the business to reputational and operational risks. Immediate remediation is recommended to implement HTTPS, update technologies, and establish privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

eliteVISION

Description:

PixelWall offers LED lighting solutions for interior and exterior applications including decorative, architectural, neon, and stage lighting. The site features product downloads, videos, and links to related LED and lighting technology sites.

Key Services:
LED lighting productsLighting softwareDecorative and architectural lighting solutions
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.4.2jQuery latestCloud Zoom 1.0.2Flash (YouTube embed)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

17 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:185.64.216.231
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.czDNS only
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
SOA:Serial: 2025071101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:311ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML with inline CSS and JavaScript, relying on jQuery versions including a very old 1.4.2 and the latest jQuery from code.jquery.com, both loaded over HTTP. The presence of Flash video embeds is outdated and insecure. No modern CMS or frameworks detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Hosting appears to be managed via REG-INTERNET-CZ registrar with no clear CDN or performance optimization. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Overall, the technical implementation is outdated and requires modernization to improve performance, security, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website