Skip to main content

Is pixspy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - CEDAR LAKE VENTURES, INC. Reviews

pixspy.com favicon

Is pixspy.com Safe? Security Analysis for CEDAR LAKE VENTURES, INC.

https://pixspy.com

Check if pixspy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsCloudFront CDNHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 2:00:12 PM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Pix Spy is a specialized web-based image inspection tool developed and operated by Cedar Lake Ventures, Inc. Founded in 2018, the company offers a free, ad-free, and fully client-side image analysis platform targeting professionals and enthusiasts in graphic design and digital imaging. The tool provides advanced pixel-level inspection features including measurement, color picking, cropping, redaction, and multi-image comparison, positioning itself as a niche utility in the image editing ecosystem. The website is well-structured, multilingual, and integrates with several companion services enhancing its utility.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsCloudFront CDNHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Pix Spy operates on a free-to-use model without advertisements, focusing on delivering value through a high-quality, browser-based tool. Its market positioning is niche but strong within the image editing and inspection segment, appealing to users requiring detailed pixel analysis. The company leverages partnerships with related image processing services to extend its ecosystem. The absence of direct monetization suggests a strategic focus on user base growth or brand building. The business maintains a small size with a clear technology focus and consistent branding.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and client-side image processing ensuring user data privacy. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization, minimizing privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response plans, and security headers indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a minor compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with good privacy-by-design principles but limited formal documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CEDAR LAKE VENTURES, INC.

Description:

Pix Spy is a free, fully in-browser image inspection multi-tool that allows users to measure, eye-drop, crop, compare, histogram, sample, redact, and more on images.

Key Services:
Image inspectionPixel measurementColor pickingImage croppingImage redactionMulti-image managementImage diffingPalette generation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsCloudFront CDNHTML5CSS3
Platforms:
Web browser
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No image uploads leave client browser (privacy by design)
  • No ads or third-party trackers except Google Analytics with IP anonymization

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score
No issues found
SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a98840485c98178@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:18.165.140.29, 18.165.140.24, 18.165.140.103, 18.165.140.35
Name Servers:
ns-1057.awsdns-04.orgDNS only
ns-1684.awsdns-18.co.ukDNS only
ns-200.awsdns-25.comDNS only
ns-982.awsdns-58.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:78ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure with CloudFront CDN for fast content delivery. It uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization for minimal user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and multilingual, indicating a mature technical implementation. No CMS or frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight stack. Performance is fast with good SEO and accessibility basics. Technical risks are low, but adding security headers and formalizing security documentation would strengthen the infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website