Skip to main content

Is pixverse.ai a Scam? Security Check Results - pixverse.ai Reviews

pixverse.ai favicon

Is pixverse.ai Safe? Security Analysis for PixVerse | Create Amazing AI Videos from Text & Photos with AI Video Generator

Check if pixverse.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 2:21:40 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at app.pixverse.ai/onboard is currently inaccessible or heavily restricted, likely due to web application firewall (WAF) or security challenge mechanisms. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or blocked, with no registrar, creation, or expiry dates provided, indicating privacy protection or data withholding. The website content is minimal and truncated, with no visible business information, contact details, or policies. The site uses the Ant Design framework but lacks substantive content or metadata. This limits the ability to assess the business, technical infrastructure, or security posture comprehensively. The absence of HTTPS and security headers further weakens the security stance. Overall, the site appears to be in an early or restricted state, with low trust and credibility indicators.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There are no visible market positioning, competitive advantages, or partnership details. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS data and minimal website content suggest either a new or intentionally obscured operation. Without contact or policy information, the business credibility is low.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and visible security policies. The WHOIS data is blocked or privacy protected, which may be justified in some cases but reduces transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site likely employs a WAF or security challenge that restricts access, which is a positive security control but also limits external assessment. Overall, the security maturity appears low with significant gaps in compliance and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

WHOIS query returned 'Malformed request' and raw WHOIS data is incomplete. HTML content is truncated and minimal, indicating possible WAF or security challenge blocking full content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Frameworks:
Ant Design

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request or privacy protection

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15724800; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +include:_netblocks.m.feishu.cn -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:pixverse.ai
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/15/2025 (42 days)
SANs:pixverse.ai, *.pixverse.ai

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(791 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.13.127, 104.18.12.127
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:d7f, 2606:4700::6812:c7f
Name Servers:
destiny.ns.cloudflare.com
huxley.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: mx1.feishu.cn
5: mx2.feishu.cn
10: mx3.feishu.cn
SOA:Serial: 2379503505, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses the Ant Design framework, indicating a modern UI approach. However, the content is minimal and truncated, suggesting either a blocked page or incomplete deployment. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The lack of metadata, SEO tags, and accessibility features indicates technical immaturity. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to limited content. The site likely employs a WAF or security challenge that restricts full content access, impacting analysis.
Analyze Another Website