Is pixy.org Safe? Security Analysis for Domains By Proxy, LLC
Check if pixy.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Pixy.org is a website offering a wide selection of free stock photos, vectors, and art illustrations targeted at a general audience seeking free visual content. The site has been operational since 2011 and is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics for tracking and monetization through Google Adsense. The website design is professional with clear navigation and search capabilities, optimized for mobile devices. However, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, and no contact information is provided, which impacts user trust and compliance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and DNSSEC. The domain registration is privacy protected by Domains By Proxy, LLC, which is common for this type of site and does not raise immediate legitimacy concerns. Overall, the site is functional and serves its niche well but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security hardening.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Pixy.org operates as a free stock image repository, likely monetized through advertising (Google Adsense). Its market position is niche, catering to users needing free images for various purposes. The business model relies on ad revenue rather than direct sales or subscriptions. The absence of direct company contact details or legal disclosures suggests a low-profile operation. The use of privacy protection for domain registration is typical for such sites. The partnership ecosystem is limited to advertising and analytics providers. Growth indicators are not evident from the data, and the site appears stable but with room for improvement in transparency and compliance.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. Forms use GET method for search, which is acceptable but should be monitored for injection risks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited security maturity. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is basic and should be enhanced to protect users and improve trust.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Domains By Proxy, LLC
A wide selection of free stock photos, vectors and art illustrations
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Secure forms with GET method for search
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, health, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 68 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings