Skip to main content

Is planhat.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Planhat Reviews

planhat.com favicon

Is planhat.com Safe? Security Analysis for Planhat

Check if planhat.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Ads PixelLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter Ads+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:56:21 PM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Planhat is a technology company specializing in Customer Success Software designed to unify go-to-market data, teams, and tools to help businesses deliver more value to their customers efficiently. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Framer platform, integrating multiple marketing and analytics technologies such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Despite the lack of WHOIS data, the website content and technical infrastructure indicate a legitimate and operational business focused on SaaS solutions for customer success. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but the absence of explicit privacy policies, security headers, and contact information for security incidents suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and safe for general audiences, but domain registration verification is recommended to confirm legitimacy.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Ads PixelLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter AdsReddit PixelBing AdsDemandbase

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Planhat operates in the competitive SaaS market for customer success management, targeting businesses seeking to optimize customer relationships and data integration. Their business model revolves around providing software solutions that unify data and teams, enhancing customer value delivery. The company leverages a broad marketing ecosystem including major ad networks and tracking pixels to reach its audience. While the website lacks explicit business contact details and legal disclosures, the consistent branding and quality content suggest a medium-sized technology firm with a focus on growth and market presence. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, and no incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by implementing recommended security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Planhat

Description:

We build Customer Success Software that unifies your go-to-market data, teams and tools so you can deliver more value, to more customers, faster.

Key Services:
Customer Success SoftwareData unificationTeam collaboration tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Ads PixelLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter AdsReddit PixelBing AdsDemandbase
Frameworks:
Framer (CMS/website builder)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot AnalyticsLinkedIn AnalyticsTwitter AnalyticsReddit AnalyticsBing Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
HubSpot AdsFacebook AdsTwitter AdsReddit AdsBing AdsDemandbase
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter PixelReddit PixelBing Pixel
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotDemandbase
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:3285366.spf03.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-email@planhat.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(303 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.49.35.110
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 230, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:107ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:3285366.spf03.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Framer CMS platform, utilizing modern web fonts and responsive design techniques. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools, including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Bing, and Demandbase pixels. The site loads a variety of external scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. While the site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data, the lack of explicit hosting provider information and security headers suggests potential technical debt or oversight in security hardening. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website