Skip to main content

Is playersarena.foundation a Scam? Security Check Results - League of Kingdoms Reviews

playersarena.foundation favicon

Is playersarena.foundation Safe? Security Analysis for League of Kingdoms

Check if playersarena.foundation is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptVue.jsFontAwesomeGoogle Tag ManagerSpine Player
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:22:42 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

League of Kingdoms is a blockchain-based MMO strategy game that enables players to own and trade digital assets via NFT technology and participate in game governance through a voting system. The website presents a modern, professional interface built with Vue.js and integrates tracking via Google Tag Manager. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and lack of privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and user trust. Overall, the site is accessible and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.jsFontAwesomeGoogle Tag ManagerSpine Player

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the niche blockchain gaming sector, targeting gamers interested in NFT ownership and decentralized governance. The business model revolves around MMO gameplay combined with blockchain asset trading and governance participation. The company appears small with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. The website lacks detailed business contact information and compliance documentation, which may impact user confidence. The use of modern web technologies and integration with popular tracking tools suggests a digitally mature operation, though privacy compliance is weak.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently lacks key security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details further complicates trust assessment. No explicit vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but SSL configuration details are unknown. Incident response and security policy information are not provided, indicating immature security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires significant improvements in transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

League of Kingdoms

Description:

'League of Kingdoms' is an MMO Strategy game where gamers fight for dominion. You can fully own and seamlessly trade digital assets through NFT technology. You will participate in game governance through transparent voting and congress system.

Key Services:
MMO strategy gamingNFT digital asset ownership and tradingGame governance via voting and congress system
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.jsFontAwesomeGoogle Tag ManagerSpine Player
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(549 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:18.165.140.111, 18.165.140.74, 18.165.140.56, 18.165.140.118
Name Servers:
ns-1520.awsdns-62.org
ns-1869.awsdns-41.co.uk
ns-384.awsdns-48.com
ns-518.awsdns-00.net
MX Records:
10: inbound-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Vue.js framework with JavaScript and integrates Spine Player for animations. It uses FontAwesome for icons and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO meta tags and Open Graph metadata for social sharing. Performance is moderate with preloading of CSS and JS assets. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website