Skip to main content

Is plymouth.ac.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - University of Plymouth Reviews

plymouth.ac.uk favicon

Is plymouth.ac.uk Safe? Security Analysis for University of Plymouth

https://plymouth.ac.uk

Check if plymouth.ac.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Kingdomlarge
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Cloudfront CDNGoogle Analytics+3 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 10:24:22 AM
74
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The University of Plymouth website serves as the digital presence for a large UK-based educational institution focused on advancing knowledge and transforming lives through higher education and research. The site targets prospective and current students, researchers, and the academic community, offering information about courses, research programs, and student services. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies such as AWS Cloudfront CDN, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance and user experience enhancement. The use of Ruby on Rails is implied by the presence of CSRF tokens, indicating a robust backend framework. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, explicit security headers could be more clearly implemented and documented. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie policy and GDPR-aligned consent management. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but the overall professionalism and trust indicators suggest legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing incident response and security policies, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5Cloudfront CDNGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotMicrosoft Clarity

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The University of Plymouth holds a solid market position as a reputable UK university offering a broad range of academic programs and research opportunities. Its business model centers on education and research services, targeting students and academic professionals. The website reflects a consistent branding strategy and leverages partnerships with service providers like Unibuddy and Formtitan for enhanced user engagement. Revenue streams likely include tuition fees, research grants, and partnerships. The digital presence indicates a focus on user experience and compliance, with extensive use of analytics and marketing tools. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and modern web technologies. The partnership ecosystem includes cookie management and analytics providers, supporting operational efficiency and regulatory adherence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent management, and CSRF protection. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of multiple analytics and marketing scripts is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not explicitly found and should be implemented to mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. The lack of publicly available security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively but could enhance its security maturity by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and explicitly configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

University of Plymouth

Description:

Welcome to the University of Plymouth, advancing knowledge, transforming lives.

Key Services:
Higher education coursesResearch programsStudent support services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Cloudfront CDNGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotMicrosoft Clarity
Frameworks:
Ruby on Rails (implied by csrf-token meta tags)
Platforms:
AWS Cloudfront CDN
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClaritySiteimprove Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClickAdmedo
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityCookiebot
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

83/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:cmail1.com include:spf-eu.exlibrisgroup.com include:wpm.flywire.com ip4:13.94.116.185 ip4:128.86.140.83 ip4:128.86.140.84 ip4:78.137.123.198 ip4:213.206.143.246 ip4:213.206.143. 245 ip4:13.55.88.50 ip4:40.127.167.91 ip4:198.37.159.2 ip4:168.245.16.120 ip4:52.114.0.0/16 ip4:149.72.231.78 ip4:65.52.70.69 ip4:40.87.137.188 ip4:13.69.193.62 ip4:52.169.92.144 ip4:52.138.160.68 ip4:40.127.111.38 ip4:52.178.219.123 ip4:52.178.146.231 ip 4:137.135.174.148 ip4:52.138.205.159 ip4:52.178.151.156 ip4:23.101.52.67 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:52.49.201.246 ip4:52.49.235.189 ip4:109.109.135.244 ip4:85.210.115.62 ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:rcvdkw2h@ag.eu.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:rcvdkw2h@fr.eu.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:13.69.189.111
Name Servers:
ns1-09.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-09.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-09.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-09.azure-dns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
0: plymouth-ac-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2019041204, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:59ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:cmail1.com include:spf-eu.exlibrisgroup.com include:wpm.flywire.com ip4:13.94.116.185 ip4:128.86.140.83 ip4:128.86.140.84 ip4:78.137.123.198 ip4:213.206.143.246 ip4:213.206.143. 245 ip4:13.55.88.50 ip4:40.127.167.91 ip4:198.37.159.2 ip4:168.245.16.120 ip4:52.114.0.0/16 ip4:149.72.231.78 ip4:65.52.70.69 ip4:40.87.137.188 ip4:13.69.193.62 ip4:52.169.92.144 ip4:52.138.160.68 ip4:40.127.111.38 ip4:52.178.219.123 ip4:52.178.146.231 ip 4:137.135.174.148 ip4:52.138.205.159 ip4:52.178.151.156 ip4:23.101.52.67 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:52.49.201.246 ip4:52.49.235.189 ip4:109.109.135.244 ip4:85.210.115.62 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Ruby on Rails backend (implied), JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5 frontend technologies. It leverages AWS Cloudfront as a CDN for asset delivery, improving performance and scalability. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, contributing to excellent user experience. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in asset loading and script management. The absence of explicit CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to modernize security headers and enhance SEO and accessibility further.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about plymouth.ac.uk

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website