Skip to main content

Is pngitem.com a Scam? Security Check Results - PngItem.com Limited Reviews

P

Is pngitem.com Safe? Security Analysis for PngItem.com Limited

Check if pngitem.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
jQuery 1.11.1JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 8:14:59 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

PNGitem.com Limited operates a media platform offering millions of free HD transparent PNG images for personal and non-commercial use. The website serves a broad audience including designers, content creators, and casual users seeking high-quality PNG images. The business model centers on free content distribution with user-uploaded images enhancing the repository. The site maintains a moderate market position as a large free PNG image repository with consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including jQuery 1.11.1 and custom JavaScript and CSS. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though some technical debt is evident with the use of an outdated jQuery version. Performance is moderate, and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enforced, but no advanced security headers are detected. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which impacts privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were identified in the HTML content. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness and raises questions about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security headers, updated libraries, and enhanced privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, though the site content and social media presence support legitimacy.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.1JavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

PNGitem.com Limited targets the digital media and creative content market by providing free transparent PNG images. Its competitive advantage lies in the vast collection of hand-picked HD images and user contribution features. The business model likely relies on advertising or affiliate revenue given the free access. The target customers are designers, marketers, and general users needing PNG assets. Growth indicators include a large image repository and active contributor base. The company maintains social media channels on Instagram and Twitter to engage users. Strategic observations suggest the company should enhance trust signals and domain registration transparency to strengthen market position.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and explicit GDPR adherence. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

PngItem.com Limited

Description:

PNGitem provides millions of free HD transparent images including transparent png clip art, cartoon, icon, logo, silhouette, watercolors, outlines, etc. All images are for personal use or non-commercial use.

Key Services:
free HD transparent PNG image downloadsuser image uploads
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.1JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides a large repository of free PNG images with user upload functionality.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:154.197.160.68
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsowl.comDNS only
ns2.dnsowl.comDNS only
ns3.dnsowl.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.pngitem.com
SOA:Serial: 1745827255, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:116ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including jQuery 1.11.1. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement. The lack of modern frameworks or CMS suggests a custom-built platform. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers. Accessibility is basic but functional. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but should be modernized for security and performance enhancements.
Analyze Another Website