Skip to main content

Is polychain.capital a Scam? Security Check Results - Polychain Reviews

P

Is polychain.capital Safe? Security Analysis for Polychain

Check if polychain.capital is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
HTML5JavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:55:39 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Polychain is an investment firm specializing in actively managed portfolios of blockchain-based digital assets. The company positions itself as a key player in the emerging digital asset investment space, targeting investors interested in blockchain technologies. The website content is minimal but professional, providing basic business information and contact details, with links to job application portals indicating active recruitment. Technically, the website is simple, built with basic HTML and JavaScript, lacking advanced frameworks or CMS. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking technologies, and performance appears moderate. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with room for improvement in SEO and user experience. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions and privacy protections, limiting domain ownership verification. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no vulnerabilities are apparent from the content provided. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with limited transparency in domain registration and minimal security best practices. Strategic improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Polychain operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on blockchain asset investment management. Its business model revolves around actively managing portfolios of blockchain assets to generate returns for investors. The company targets sophisticated investors interested in digital assets and blockchain technology. The presence of job application links suggests growth and active hiring. The lack of detailed company information and absence of physical addresses or phone numbers limits full business intelligence. The company appears to maintain privacy in domain registration, common in blockchain-related businesses, but this reduces transparency. Partnerships with reputable job boards indicate some ecosystem integration.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@polychain.capital

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present. There are no visible forms or inputs, reducing attack surface, but also no published security or incident response policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified but reduces trust. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, published policies, and improved transparency to meet modern security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify certificate validity.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Polychain

Description:

Polychain is an investment firm committed to exceptional returns for investors through actively managed portfolios of blockchain-based digital assets. It focuses on the emerging digital asset class created by bitcoin and blockchain technologies.

Key Services:
Actively managed portfolios of blockchain assets
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is minimalistic with limited content and no privacy or cookie policies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@polychain.capital

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:polychain.capital
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/23/2025 (78 days)
SANs:polychain.capital, *.polychain.capital

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.3.95, 172.67.68.167, 104.26.2.95
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:35f, 2606:4700:20::681a:25f, 2606:4700:20::ac43:44a7
Name Servers:
nelci.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sean.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2382081077, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML and JavaScript without use of modern frameworks or CMS. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which limits data collection but also reduces marketing insights. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. The minimalistic design reduces complexity but also limits engagement and content richness. Technical modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design frameworks, adding SEO metadata, and implementing accessibility standards.
Analyze Another Website