Skip to main content

Is polygon.technology a Scam? Security Check Results - Polygon Reviews

polygon.technology favicon

Is polygon.technology Safe? Security Analysis for Polygon

Check if polygon.technology is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Lottie animationsJavaScriptAJAX+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:30:01 PM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Polygon is a leading blockchain technology platform specializing in fast, low-cost Layer 2 scaling solutions and interoperability protocols. The website presents a professional and comprehensive ecosystem for developers and users, offering multiple blockchain solutions such as Polygon PoS, zkEVM, and AggLayer. The platform targets blockchain developers, crypto users, and enterprises seeking scalable blockchain infrastructure. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and Lottie animations, delivering excellent performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for blockchain projects, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Lottie animationsJavaScriptAJAXFinsweet Attributes (scrolldisable, cmsload)CDN for assets

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Polygon holds a strong market position as a major Layer 2 blockchain scaling solution with a large and active ecosystem. Its business model revolves around providing blockchain infrastructure, developer tools, and community support to enable scalable decentralized applications. The platform benefits from partnerships with interoperability protocols like AggLayer and blockchain explorers such as Polygon Scan. The target customers include blockchain developers, enterprises, and crypto users. Growth indicators include active community grants, developer documentation, and ecosystem job listings. Strategic observations highlight Polygon's focus on zero-knowledge rollups and cross-chain interoperability as competitive advantages.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, and contact information for incident response is missing. Privacy compliance is weak due to the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and improving header configurations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Polygon

Description:

Polygon is the fast, low-cost blockchain powering real-world assets and global payments, used by millions every day.

Key Services:
Polygon PoS chainAggLayer interoperability protocolPolygon zkEVMDeveloper tools and documentationCommunity grants and ecosystem support
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Montserrat)Lottie animationsJavaScriptAJAXFinsweet Attributes (scrolldisable, cmsload)CDN for assets
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:20572069.spf05.hubspotemail.net mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:48fbfa0d6ea84482afab61976616c162@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net
Forensic Reports:dmarc@polygon.technology

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 28 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:13.49.111.177, 16.16.119.222, 51.21.126.187
Name Servers:
nolan.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
rachel.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382486924, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:323ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:20572069.spf05.hubspotemail.net mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern and performant technical stack with Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and Lottie animations for rich user experience. Hosting is managed by Webflow, ensuring reliable uptime and fast content delivery via CDN. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities for modernization include adding progressive web app features and improving accessibility compliance. Technical risks are minimal but could arise from missing security headers and incomplete privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website