Skip to main content

Is positiveimpactrating.org a Scam? Security Check Results - PIR Reviews

positiveimpactrating.org favicon

Is positiveimpactrating.org Safe? Security Analysis for PIR

Check if positiveimpactrating.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationN/asmall
Wix.com Website Buildercore-js polyfillsfocus-within-polyfillWix Thunderbolt framework
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 3:59:08 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Positive Impact Rating website is an educational platform focused on transforming business schools by promoting sustainability and collaboration. It offers a rating system aimed at encouraging positive impact through business education. The site is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's Thunderbolt framework and standard polyfills, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The website is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, which are important for user trust and regulatory compliance. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is common for small organizations but slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a professional image with good content quality but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

Wix.com Website Buildercore-js polyfillsfocus-within-polyfillWix Thunderbolt framework

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform targets business schools and educational institutions interested in sustainability and positive impact. Its niche positioning as a sustainability rating service for business education differentiates it in the education sector. The business model revolves around providing a collaborative tool and rating system to drive change in business schools. The absence of detailed company information and contact details limits transparency. The website's partnership ecosystem and growth indicators are not evident from the available data. The use of Wix suggests a small to medium-sized operation focusing on ease of deployment and maintenance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and employs some cookie handling restrictions, indicating a baseline security posture. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response information, indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. The WHOIS privacy protection is typical but limits domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better policy disclosures and security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

PIR

Description:

The Positive Impact Rating aims to transform business schools by defining their sustainability, moving to more collaboration and providing a tool for change. Participate now!

Key Services:
Sustainability rating for business schoolsCollaboration facilitationChange tool provision
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Wix.com Website Buildercore-js polyfillsfocus-within-polyfillWix Thunderbolt framework
Frameworks:
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms:
Wix
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie handling with restrictions on certain cookies

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and polyfills

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1029 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:23.236.62.147
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt framework, which provides a modern and responsive infrastructure. It uses polyfills for legacy browser support and includes performance optimizations. The hosting is managed by Wix, which ensures reliable uptime and SSL support. The site has moderate performance and basic SEO optimization with meta tags and structured data. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No external analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating minimal tracking. The technical implementation is solid for a small educational site but could be improved with enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security practices.
Analyze Another Website