Skip to main content

Is postimages.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf Reviews

postimages.org favicon

Is postimages.org Safe? Security Analysis for Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Check if postimages.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandsmall
HTML5CSSJavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 1:56:18 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Postimages.org is a well-established free image hosting service founded in 2010, offering users the ability to upload and share images with permanent links suitable for forums, blogs, and social media. The website supports multiple languages and provides additional tools such as website plugins and a Windows application, positioning itself as a versatile platform for image hosting needs. The business model centers on free hosting with optional user accounts and integrations, targeting a broad general audience including forum users and website owners. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with Cloudflare DNS services supporting domain resolution. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, though it lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. Security is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place; however, DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent, indicating room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit security or incident response policies are notable gaps. The domain is privacy-protected, which is justified for this type of service, and the domain age supports legitimacy. Overall, the risk is moderate with recommendations to enhance security headers, enable DNSSEC, and improve privacy compliance. Strategically, Postimages.org should focus on strengthening its security and privacy frameworks to build greater trust, particularly by implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC. These steps will enhance compliance and user confidence, supporting sustained growth in a competitive market.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Postimages.org operates in the technology sector as a free image hosting service with a focus on ease of use and integration with forums and websites. Its competitive advantage lies in its longevity since 2010 and multilingual support, catering to a global user base. The business model relies on free service offerings with potential monetization through plugins and apps. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a lean operational model focused on automated service delivery. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, indicating limited external business relationships. Growth indicators include continuous domain registration and active website maintenance. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy and security transparency to maintain competitive positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of Postimages.org is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are active, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit security policies limits the overall security posture. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could delay response to security events. Data protection practices are not explicitly documented, and cookie consent is absent, raising compliance concerns under GDPR. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics that could expose user data. Overall, the security culture appears basic with opportunities for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Description:

Provides free image upload and hosting integration for forums. Free picture hosting and photo sharing for websites and blogs.

Key Services:
Free image uploadImage hostingPermanent image linksForum integrationWebsite pluginsWindows app
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(130 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:185.221.219.49
Name Servers:
igor.ns.cloudflare.com
naomi.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2378433858, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:87ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, supported by Cloudflare DNS services. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks, indicating a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization and SEO best practices in place. The site includes forms for image upload with client-side restrictions on file types and sizes, enhancing usability and security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt that could expose the site to DNS spoofing and web-based attacks. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including enhanced accessibility features and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website