Skip to main content

Is poynter.org a Scam? Security Check Results - The Poynter Institute Reviews

poynter.org favicon

Is poynter.org Safe? Security Analysis for The Poynter Institute

Check if poynter.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag Manager+8 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:17:34 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Poynter Institute is a globally recognized nonprofit media institute dedicated to strengthening democracy through journalism ethics, fact-checking, and media literacy training. It operates several subsidiaries and partner initiatives including the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), MediaWise, and PolitiFact, positioning itself as a leader in media education and ethical journalism. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on educational content and resources for journalists and the public. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including WooCommerce for e-commerce, LearnDash for LMS functionality, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Chartbeat, and Hotjar. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, indicating a secure and user-friendly infrastructure. However, some security headers and privacy compliance elements like explicit privacy and cookie policies are not clearly visible in the provided content. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices with HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling, but could improve by implementing additional security headers and publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query failure or privacy protection, which is common and justified for nonprofit organizations. Overall, the Poynter Institute website is a high-quality, trustworthy platform with strong business credibility and a solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security headers would further enhance its security posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerChartbeatHotjarjQueryFontAwesomePresto PlayerUncanny ToolkitLearnDash LMSBuddyPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Poynter Institute holds a strong market position as a nonprofit leader in journalism education and media ethics. Its business model revolves around providing training, fact-checking services, and resources to journalists and the public, supported by donations and partnerships. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and partner sites indicates a broad ecosystem that enhances its reach and influence. The website's content and structure support its mission effectively, targeting media professionals and citizens interested in media literacy. The use of modern web technologies and analytics tools suggests a mature digital presence, although some compliance aspects could be strengthened.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure form implementations. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and nonce tokens in forms adds protection against automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Poynter Institute

Description:

Poynter is a nonprofit media institute and newsroom that provides fact-checking, media literacy and journalism ethics training to citizens and journalists in service to democracy.

Key Services:
Fact-checkingMedia literacy trainingJournalism ethics trainingConsulting and coachingEvents and prizes
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerChartbeatHotjarjQueryFontAwesomePresto PlayerUncanny ToolkitLearnDash LMSBuddyPress
Frameworks:
WordPressWooCommerceLearnDash
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with nonce tokens

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsChartbeatHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ad ManagerHBMP
Tracking Pixels:
ChartbeatHotjarPoptin
Marketing Tools:
HotjarChartbeat
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.salesforce.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:itorders@poynter.org
Forensic Reports:itorders@poynter.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(404 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
AAAA Records:2001:4801:7901:0:c5ce:526c:0:1a
Name Servers:
ns0.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns1.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns3.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns4.dnsmadeeasy.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx5.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2009010187, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:147ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.salesforce.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a robust WordPress platform enhanced with WooCommerce for e-commerce and LearnDash for learning management. It leverages popular JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, including jQuery, Google Analytics, Chartbeat, and Hotjar, indicating a well-instrumented site for performance and user behavior insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript frameworks. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to optimize loading times and accessibility. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from modernization in security headers and privacy compliance implementations.
Analyze Another Website