Skip to main content

Is premierbet.cm a Scam? Security Check Results - premierbet.cm Reviews

P

Is premierbet.cm Safe? Security Analysis for Sorry, you have been blocked

Check if premierbet.cm is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:35:41 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.premierbet.com/cm is currently inaccessible due to a blocking mechanism, likely a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security filter, as indicated by the minimal HTML content and the 'Sorry, you have been blocked' message. This prevents extraction of meaningful business, technical, or security information from the site. The WHOIS query for the domain returned no match, indicating the domain may not be registered, expired, or protected by privacy services that do not disclose registration data. Consequently, the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the domain cannot be confidently established. From a technical perspective, the lack of accessible content means no technologies, frameworks, or hosting details can be identified. Security posture cannot be assessed due to absence of headers, SSL information, or visible security policies. The site does not expose any contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service, which further limits trust and compliance evaluation. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to inaccessibility and lack of transparency. Without access, it is impossible to verify business credibility or security maturity. It is recommended to resolve the blocking issue to enable a full assessment. Until then, the domain should be treated with caution. Strategic recommendations include investigating the cause of the block, ensuring proper domain registration and WHOIS data availability, implementing visible privacy and security policies, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked status of the website and absence of accessible content or WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be either unregistered or protected, and no information about market positioning, business model, or partnerships is available. The lack of visible business information suggests the site is either inactive or restricted, limiting any competitive or operational insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the blocked content and lack of accessible headers or SSL data. The presence of a blocking mechanism suggests some level of security enforcement, but the absence of visible security policies, contact points for incident response, or certifications indicates low maturity. The domain's WHOIS invisibility further complicates trust assessment. No vulnerabilities or security best practices can be confirmed or denied from the available data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Investigate and resolve the website access block to enable comprehensive analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returns a minimal HTML page with title 'Sorry, you have been blocked' and an iframe loading a 403 error page, indicating access is blocked likely by a WAF or security mechanism.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to blocking, preventing meaningful content or metadata extraction.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com include:authsmtp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:premierbet.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/26/2025 (50 days)
SANs:premierbet.com, *.premierbet.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(383 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.108.227, 104.18.107.227
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:6ce3, 2606:4700::6812:6be3
Name Servers:
donald.ns.cloudflare.com
karina.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: mx0.mail.ovh.net
100: mx3.mail.ovh.net
5: mx1.mail.ovh.net
50: mx2.mail.ovh.net
SOA:Serial: 2379977971, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:63ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com include:authsmtp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical analysis is limited due to the blocked content. No scripts, meta tags, or technologies were detected in the minimal HTML. The site uses an iframe to load a 403 error page, indicating server-side access restrictions. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting details are identifiable. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed. The site requires remediation to restore normal access and enable technical evaluation.
Analyze Another Website