Skip to main content

Is premierbet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Premier Bet International Reviews

premierbet.com favicon

Is premierbet.com Safe? Security Analysis for Premier Bet International

Check if premierbet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/amedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle FontsJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:25:28 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Premier Bet International operates as an online sports betting and gaming platform primarily targeting African markets. The website presents a basic but functional design with moderate branding consistency and key partner logos displayed. The technical infrastructure leverages common web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts, with HTTPS and a Content-Security-Policy header implemented, indicating a reasonable security baseline. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. The site lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and no direct contact information is provided, which impacts trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the platform appears operational but requires improvements in transparency, compliance, and security practices to enhance credibility and user trust.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle FontsJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets sports bettors and gaming customers in Africa, operating an online betting model. The market position is regional with partnerships indicated by displayed logos such as Nairabet and Mercury. Revenue streams likely include betting commissions and gaming fees. The absence of detailed company information and registration data limits full business intelligence assessment. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are implied but not explicitly documented. The platform would benefit from clearer business disclosures and enhanced compliance to support expansion and regulatory adherence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header in place. However, other important security headers are missing, and no published security policies or incident response contacts are found. The lack of WHOIS data and absence of privacy and cookie policies represent compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. To improve security maturity, the platform should implement additional headers, publish security and privacy policies, and provide clear incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Premier Bet International

Description:

Premier Bet International is a betting and gaming platform offering sports betting and gaming services primarily targeting African markets.

Key Services:
Sports bettingGaming
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle FontsJavaScriptCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • Content-Security-Policy header implemented
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0; mode=block"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com include:authsmtp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

70/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Short HSTS Max-Age

LOW

HSTS max-age is less than 1 year

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:premierbet.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/26/2025 (50 days)
SANs:premierbet.com, *.premierbet.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(383 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.108.227, 104.18.107.227
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:6be3, 2606:4700::6812:6ce3
Name Servers:
donald.ns.cloudflare.com
karina.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
50: mx2.mail.ovh.net
5: mx1.mail.ovh.net
100: mx3.mail.ovh.net
1: mx0.mail.ovh.net
SOA:Serial: 2379977971, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com include:authsmtp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The absence of a CMS or advanced frameworks suggests a custom or lightweight implementation. SEO and accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate but could benefit from modernization and enhanced compliance features.
Analyze Another Website