Skip to main content

Is primadovolena.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SMARTTRAVEL s.r.o. Reviews

S

Is primadovolena.com Safe? Security Analysis for SMARTTRAVEL s.r.o.

Check if primadovolena.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityCzech Republicsmall
jQueryjQuery UI DatepickerFlash (deprecated technology)
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 3:23:35 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website primadovolena.com serves as a photo and video gallery portal for the Czech travel agency SMARTTRAVEL s.r.o., showcasing images and videos from various outdoor and adventure travel events such as rafting, kayaking, and cycling tours. The site targets Czech-speaking customers interested in these activities and acts as a community engagement platform by inviting users to share their own media. Technically, the site uses legacy technologies like Flash alongside jQuery and jQuery UI for interactive elements, indicating a need for modernization. Security posture is moderate but lacks modern security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and Google Analytics is used without clear consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, which is a critical concern for trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and domain legitimacy to enhance trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

jQueryjQuery UI DatepickerFlash (deprecated technology)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SMARTTRAVEL s.r.o. operates in the hospitality sector focusing on niche outdoor adventure travel. Their business model includes organizing tours and leveraging user-generated content to promote engagement. The company appears small-sized and primarily serves the Czech market. The website acts as a supplementary platform to their main site smarttravel.cz, which is identified as a partner domain. The lack of domain registration data and absence of comprehensive privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company could benefit from strengthening its digital presence, improving privacy transparency, and ensuring domain registration consistency to support growth and credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@smarttravel.cz
i*****@primadovolena.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic with no evidence of modern security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. The use of deprecated Flash content introduces potential vulnerabilities and compatibility issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, combined with Google Analytics tracking without visible consent, indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain ownership legitimacy, which is a significant risk factor. Overall, the security maturity level is low to moderate, requiring urgent attention to privacy compliance, domain legitimacy, and modern security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enforce HTTPS site-wide and ensure SSL/TLS certificates are valid and up to date.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SMARTTRAVEL s.r.o.

Description:

Website hosting photo and video galleries from events organized by the travel agency SMART travel, offering various outdoor and holiday activities.

Key Services:
Organized rafting, kayaking, cycling, skiing, and outdoor toursPhoto and video galleries from travel eventsCustomer engagement via content sharing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryjQuery UI DatepickerFlash (deprecated technology)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS not confirmed in provided data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (urchin.js)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 23 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(4 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.129.138.40
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.cz
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
MX Records:
10: mxavas.forpsi.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses jQuery and jQuery UI for datepicker functionality, indicating reliance on older JavaScript libraries. The presence of Flash content is outdated and poses security and compatibility risks. The HTML structure is basic with minimal SEO optimization and accessibility features. No CMS or modern frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate but could be improved by removing legacy technologies and optimizing assets. Mobile optimization is basic, lacking responsive design elements. The site lacks modern security headers and HTTPS enforcement details are not visible, suggesting potential technical debt and security risks. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website