Skip to main content

Is privacyprotect.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Newfold Digital, Inc. Reviews

N

Is privacyprotect.org Safe? Security Analysis for Newfold Digital, Inc.

Check if privacyprotect.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
JavaScriptPrototype.jsScriptaculousGoogle reCAPTCHACloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 7:00:46 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

PrivacyProtect.org is a domain privacy protection service operated by Newfold Digital, Inc., providing WHOIS masking and contact forms for domain owners and abuse reporting. The website is functional with basic content and form-based communication channels, targeting domain registrants and internet users seeking to contact domain owners or report abuse. The technical infrastructure includes JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js and Scriptaculous, Google reCAPTCHA for spam prevention, and Cloudflare DNS hosting. The site lacks advanced CMS or modern frameworks but serves its niche purpose adequately. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and clientTransferProhibited domain status, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit cookie policy or GDPR compliance statements on the main site, though a privacy center is linked from the parent company. Overall, the site is legitimate, with consistent WHOIS data and a long domain age, but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptPrototype.jsScriptaculousGoogle reCAPTCHACloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in domain privacy protection services. It is a medium-sized entity founded in 2004 and owned by Newfold Digital, Inc. The company’s market position is niche, focusing on privacy masking and abuse reporting for domain registrants. Revenue likely derives from privacy protection services bundled with domain registrations. The target audience includes domain owners seeking privacy and internet users reporting abuse. The company leverages partnerships with registrars and uses Google Analytics for insights. The business model is service-oriented, acting as an intermediary for domain contact and abuse management. Strategic observations include the need to enhance privacy policy transparency and security posture to maintain trust and compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms to mitigate spam and abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are publicly available, which may impact incident handling readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized domain transfers. Compliance gaps exist in privacy and cookie policy disclosures, which could affect GDPR adherence. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and integrity.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Newfold Digital, Inc.

Description:

PrivacyProtect.org provides privacy protection services for domain name registrants by masking their WHOIS information and offering contact forms to reach domain owners or report abuse.

Key Services:
Domain WHOIS privacy protectionContact domain owner formReport abuse form
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptPrototype.jsScriptaculousGoogle reCAPTCHACloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides domain privacy protection services with contact and abuse reporting forms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:115.114.106.25 a:livechat-1.myorderbox.com a:livechat.myorderbox.com redirect=_spf.mailhostbox.com include:_spf.mailersportal.smtp.com
DNS Lookups:4/10
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:privacyprotect.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:12/5/2025 (89 days)
SANs:privacyprotect.org, *.privacyprotect.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(380 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.64.148.124, 104.18.39.132
AAAA Records:2606:4700:4405::ac40:947c, 2a06:98c1:3101::6812:2784
Name Servers:
andy.ns.cloudflare.com
dora.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
100: mx2.mailhostbox.com
100: mx3.mailhostbox.com
100: mx1.mailhostbox.com
SOA:Serial: 2382680183, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:115.114.106.25 a:livechat-1.myorderbox.com a:livechat.myorderbox.com redirect=_spf.mailhostbox.com include:_spf.mailersportal.smtp.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js and Scriptaculous, indicating a dated technology stack. Google reCAPTCHA integration is present for form security. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS with registrar PDR Ltd. The site lacks a modern CMS or framework, which may limit scalability and maintainability. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Technical debt is evident in the use of older scripts and lack of security headers. Modernization opportunities include adopting contemporary frameworks, enhancing SEO metadata, and improving security configurations.
Analyze Another Website