Skip to main content

Is privataismezs.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Privātais mežs Reviews

privataismezs.lv favicon

Is privataismezs.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Privātais mežs

Check if privataismezs.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviamedium
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginElementor 3.30.3jQuery 3.6.0ShortPixel image optimization
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:43:09 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Privātais mežs is a Latvian company specializing in sustainable forestry management and real estate acquisition, targeting private forest owners in Latvia. The company positions itself as a leading partner in the forestry sector, offering comprehensive services including forest property acquisition, agricultural land purchase, logging rights acquisition, and real estate transactions. It operates as part of the Skovest Grupp conglomerate, which includes several subsidiaries focused on forestry, CO2 emissions trading, and investment opportunities in forest properties. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with good SEO and mobile optimization. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with GDPR compliance. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Contact information is clearly provided, but no explicit security or incident response policies are found.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginElementor 3.30.3jQuery 3.6.0ShortPixel image optimization

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a strong market position in Latvia's forestry and real estate sectors, leveraging its parent company Skovest Grupp's network and subsidiaries to offer a full cycle of forestry management services. Its business model focuses on sustainable practices, appealing to environmentally conscious private landowners. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a clear target audience and professional service offerings. The presence of testimonials and detailed service descriptions enhance credibility. The company appears to have a stable partnership ecosystem and growth potential within the Baltic region.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (4)

i*****@privataismezs.lv
e*****@privataismezs.lv
o*****@privataismezs.lv
g*****@privataismezs.lv

Phone Numbers (4)

+3712232****
+3712233****
+3712590****
+3712600****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of advanced security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is moderate, reflecting good practices but missing advanced protections and transparency. The lack of WHOIS data reduces trust in domain legitimacy, which should be addressed to improve overall security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Privātais mežs

Description:

Nosakām jaunus ilgtspējīgas meža apsaimniekošanas standartus, jo esam labākais partneris zinošiem Latvijas meža īpašniekiem.

Key Services:
Meža īpašumu iegādeLauksaimniecības zemes iegādeCiršanas tiesību iegādeNekustamo īpašumu iegādeMeža apsaimniekošanas plāni un konsultācijas
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginElementor 3.30.3jQuery 3.6.0ShortPixel image optimization
Frameworks:
WordPressElementor
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEOComplianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:185.7.252.207
Name Servers:
ns.elkdata.eeDNS only
ns2.elkdata.eeDNS only
ns3.elkdata.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2025061701, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:66ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery 3.6.0 and ShortPixel for image optimization, contributing to moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation menus and multimedia content including videos and images. Some inline scripts and deferred loading techniques are used to optimize loading times. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience with opportunities for further optimization.
Analyze Another Website